« PreviousContinue »
In which the History goes forward about Twelve
Containing Instructions very necessary to be
perused by modern Critics. READER, it is impossible we should know what sort of person thou wilt be; for, perhaps, thou may'st be as learned in human nature as Shakespeare himself was, and, perhaps, thou may'st be no wiser than some of his editors. Now, lest this latter should be the case, we think proper, before we go any farther together, to give thee a few wholesome admonitions ; that thou may'st not as grossly misunderstand and misrepresent us, as some of the said editors have misunderstood and misrepresented their author.
First, then, we warn thee not too hastily to condemn any of the incidents in this our history, as
impertinent and foreign to our main design, because thou dost not immediately conceive in what manner such incident may conduce to that design. This work may, indeed, be considered as a great creation of our own; and for a little reptile of a critic to presume to find fault with any of its parts, without knowing the mannerin which the whole is connected, and before he comes to the final catastrophe, is a most presumptuous absurdity. The allusion and metaphor we have here made use of, we must acknowledge to be infinitely too great for our occasion ; but there is, indeed, no other, which is at all adequate to express the difference between an author of the first rate, and a critic of the lowest.
Another caution we would give thee, my good reptile, is, that thou dost not find out too near a resemblance between certain characters here introduced; as for instance, between the landlady who appears in the seventh book, and herin the ninth. Thou art to know,friend, that there are certain characteristics, in which most individuals of every profession and occupation agree. To be able to preserve these characteristics,andat the same time to diversify their operations, is one talent of a good writer. Again, to mark the nice distinction between two personsactuated by the same vice or folly, is another; and as this last talent is found in very few writers, so is the true discernment of it found in as few readers; though, I believe, the observation of this forms a very principal pleasure in those who are capable of the discovery; every person, forinstance, candistinguish between SirEpicure Niammom,and Sir Fopling Flutter; butto note the difference between Sir Fopling Flutter and Sir Courtly Nice, requires a more exquisite judgement; for want of which, vulgar spectators of plays very often do great injustice in the theatre; where I have sometimes known a poet in danger of being convicted as a thief, upon niuch worse evidence than the resemblance of hands hath