Urdu/Hindi: An Artificial Divide: African Heritage, Mesopotamian Roots, Indian Culture & Britiah ColonialismIn a blow against the British Empire, Khan suggests that London artificially divided India's Hindu and Muslim populations by splitting their one language in two, then burying the evidence in obscure scholarly works outside the public view. All language is political -- and so is the boundary between one language and another. The author analyzes the origins of Urdu, one of the earliest known languages, and propounds the iconoclastic views that Hindi came from pre-Aryan Dravidian and Austric-Munda, not from Aryan's Sanskrit (which, like the Indo-European languages, Greek and Latin, etc., are rooted in the Middle East/Mesopotamia, not in Europe). Hindi's script came from the Aramaic system, similar to Greek, and in the 1800s, the British initiated the divisive game of splitting one language in two, Hindi (for the Hindus) and Urdu (for the Muslims). These facts, he says, have been buried and nearly lost in turgid academic works. Khan bolsters his hypothesis with copious technical linguistic examples. This may spark a revolution in linguistic history! Urdu/Hindi: An Artificial Divide integrates the out of Africa linguistic evolution theory with the fossil linguistics of Middle East, and discards the theory that Sanskrit descended from a hypothetical proto-IndoEuropean language and by degeneration created dialects, Urdu/Hindi and others. It shows that several tribes from the Middle East created the hybrid by cumulative evolution. The oldest groups, Austric and Dravidian, starting 8000 B.C. provided the grammar/syntax plus about 60% of vocabulary, S.K.T. added 10% after 1500 B.C. and Arabic/Persian 20-30% after A.D. 800. The book reveals Mesopotamia as the linguistic melting pot of Sumerian, Babylonian, Elamite, Hittite-Hurrian-Mitanni, etc., with a common script and vocabularies shared mutually and passed on to I.E., S.K.T., D.R., Arabic and then to Hindi/Urdu; in fact the author locates oldest evidence of S.K.T. in Syria. The book also exposes the myths of a revealed S.K.T. or Hebrew and the fiction of linguistic races, i.e. Aryan, Semitic, etc. The book supports the one world concept and reveals the potential of Urdu/Hindi to unite all genetic elements, races and regions of the Indo-Pakistan sub-continent. This is important reading not only for those interested to understand the divisive exploitation of languages in British-led India's partition, but for those interested in: - The science and history of origin of Urdu/Hindi (and other languages) - The false claims of linguistic races and creation - History of Languages and Scripts - Language, Mythology and Racism - Ancient History and Fossil Languages - British Rule and India's Partition. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 79
Page 3
... later by others such as Sanskrit, Arabic, and Persian; this apparently unsettles the currently held view of Urdu/Hindi as a daughter dialect of Sanskrit, a 19th -century idea rooted in Hindu reli- gious myth, the German myth of an Aryan ...
... later by others such as Sanskrit, Arabic, and Persian; this apparently unsettles the currently held view of Urdu/Hindi as a daughter dialect of Sanskrit, a 19th -century idea rooted in Hindu reli- gious myth, the German myth of an Aryan ...
Page 14
... later absorbed into Old Persian. In the theater of Syria/Turkey, Hurrian-Mitanni and Hittite (~1500 BC) came into being and later evolved into various IE branches, Greek, Sanskrit, and elements of Old Persian. Urdu's home theater, India ...
... later absorbed into Old Persian. In the theater of Syria/Turkey, Hurrian-Mitanni and Hittite (~1500 BC) came into being and later evolved into various IE branches, Greek, Sanskrit, and elements of Old Persian. Urdu's home theater, India ...
Page 35
... later interacted , exchanging vocab- ulary , syntax , and grammar , creating hybrids , and also replacing even whole lan- guages . Some excellent examples include English , French , and Spanish as mother tongues among African and ...
... later interacted , exchanging vocab- ulary , syntax , and grammar , creating hybrids , and also replacing even whole lan- guages . Some excellent examples include English , French , and Spanish as mother tongues among African and ...
Page 36
... later secondary dispersal . The language ( s ) of this group or groups ( unknown ) must have been absorbed into those of previous and later settlers — Stonehenge , the pre - Celtic culture of England , Peruvians , the earliest phase of ...
... later secondary dispersal . The language ( s ) of this group or groups ( unknown ) must have been absorbed into those of previous and later settlers — Stonehenge , the pre - Celtic culture of England , Peruvians , the earliest phase of ...
Page 37
... later became bait and ab in Urdu. In the next four thousand years or so, by the time of Cyrus of Iran (6th century BC) we find evidence of comparative linguistics, bi- and trilingual dictionaries, the appearance of more consonants, the ...
... later became bait and ab in Urdu. In the next four thousand years or so, by the time of Cyrus of Iran (6th century BC) we find evidence of comparative linguistics, bi- and trilingual dictionaries, the appearance of more consonants, the ...
Contents
3 | |
9 | |
11 | |
13 | |
33 | |
59 | |
Chapter IV AustricMundaDravidian and Oldest HindiUrdu | 83 |
Chapter V SanskritPrakrit and OldUrduHindi | 109 |
Table of Contents | xi |
Foreword | 3 |
Acknowledgments | 9 |
List of Tables and Illustrations | 11 |
Chapter I Mesopotamian Roots and Language Classification | 13 |
Chapter II Phonetics Linguistics and Genetics DNA | 33 |
Source of Semitic Dravidian and IndoEuropeanSanskrit | 59 |
Chapter IV AustricMundaDravidian and Oldest HindiUrdu | 83 |
New Substrates from the Middle East | 133 |
Chapter VII Language of Saints and Sultans | 153 |
Chapter VIII Secular Moghuls and Secular Language | 171 |
Official Language of British India | 197 |
British Bengal | 225 |
Chapter XI Partition of Language Land and Hearts | 253 |
Chapter XII Urdu through the 20th Century | 275 |
Chapter XIII Hindis Evolution through the 20th Century | 295 |
A Show Biz Power | 315 |
Chapter XV UrduHindi of America and the World | 333 |
Common Origin | 347 |
Chapter XVII Mesopotamian Realism and ReClassification | 363 |
Bibliography | 389 |
Index | 397 |
The Politics of Language | v |
Abbreviations | vii |
Chapter V SanskritPrakrit and OldUrduHindi | 109 |
New Substrates from the Middle East | 133 |
Chapter VII Language of Saints and Sultans | 153 |
Chapter VIII Secular Moghuls and Secular Language | 171 |
Official Language of British India | 197 |
British Bengal | 225 |
Chapter XI Partition of Language Land and Hearts | 253 |
Chapter XII Urdu through the 20th Century | 275 |
Chapter XIII Hindis Evolution through the 20th Century | 295 |
A Show Biz Power | 315 |
Chapter XV UrduHindi of America and the World | 333 |
Common Origin | 347 |
Chapter XVII Mesopotamian Realism and ReClassification | 363 |
Bibliography | 389 |
397 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
19th century agglutinating Ahmad Akhtar Aligarh Allahabad ancient and/or Arabic Arabic-Persian Aramaic Aryan Asia Austric Austric-Munda Bengali Bombay British Celtic Chandra chapter consonants created culture Delhi dialects Dravidian earlier Elamite English evolution example famous film flexion focused follows Ghalib ghazal grammar Greek guage Gujrat hain Hasan Hindi Hindus and Muslims Hittite hybrid India inflected Iqbal Islamic Jalibi Khan Khari boli King Lahore language later Latin linguistic literature Lucknow meaning Merritt Ruhlen Mesopotamia modern Moghul Munda mushairas Muslim myths Nagari nahein North oldest Pakistan Persian Persian-Arabic phase phonemes poetry poets political Prof prose Punjab Quran religion religious reveals root Ruhlen S. K. Chatterji Sanskrit scholars script secular Semitic Shah Sindhi Sir Syed South speech subcontinent Sumerian syntax Table themes translation Urdu Urdu language Urdu’s Urdu/Hindi Vedic verbs vocabulary vowels West Asian words writers
Popular passages
Page 17 - Greek, more copious than the Latin, and more exquisitely refined than either, yet bearing to both of them a stronger affinity both in the roots of verbs and in the forms of grammar, than could possibly have been produced by accident; so strong indeed, that no philologer could examine them all three, without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists...