Report of the First[-thirty-first] Annual Meeting of the Virginia State Bar Association, Volume 49Virginia State Bar Association, 1937 - Bar associations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 65
Page 83
... question whether it would arouse so much opposition in the legislature that other provisions that ought to go through might be damaged or destroyed by reason of anything as radical as this being attached . It is rather a question of ...
... question whether it would arouse so much opposition in the legislature that other provisions that ought to go through might be damaged or destroyed by reason of anything as radical as this being attached . It is rather a question of ...
Page 87
... question of insanity may be fairly sub- mitted to the jury . " Mr. Collins Denny , Jr. , of Richmond : Did the Committee consider the possible constitutional question in this matter of alibi ? If the law requires a man who intends to ...
... question of insanity may be fairly sub- mitted to the jury . " Mr. Collins Denny , Jr. , of Richmond : Did the Committee consider the possible constitutional question in this matter of alibi ? If the law requires a man who intends to ...
Page 178
... question ( except a question seeking disclosure of privileged communications be- tween the attorney and a client ) he may be suspended from practicing law until he answers it , unless he refuses to answer the question on the ground that ...
... question ( except a question seeking disclosure of privileged communications be- tween the attorney and a client ) he may be suspended from practicing law until he answers it , unless he refuses to answer the question on the ground that ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action admission adopted amendment American Annual Meeting applicants appoint approved Arlington attorney August authority Bar Association bill By-Laws called Chairman charge CHARLES Circuit client Code commissioner Constitution counsel County Court of Appeals desire District duty EDWARD effect elected evidence examination Executive Committee fact FRANK GEORGE give HENRY instructions interest JAMES JOHN JOSEPH Judge Judicial jury justice law school lawyer Legislation Lynchburg MARTIN matter membership ment motion Norfolk offered opinion passed person Point practice present President profession proposed question reason received recommendation record referred resolution RICHARD Richmond Roanoke ROBERT rules Sands seconded Secretary STUART suggested Supreme Court Tazewell thing THOMAS tion trial University Virginia Virginia State Bar Volume vote White Sulphur Springs WILLIAM