Report of the First[-thirty-first] Annual Meeting of the Virginia State Bar Association, Volume 49Virginia State Bar Association, 1937 - Bar associations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 22
Page 195
... examination . If it be assumed that the purpose of the law school and the purpose of the bar examination be the same , what are we to infer when the law school graduate fails on the bar examination ? Nothing , certainly , when one fails ...
... examination . If it be assumed that the purpose of the law school and the purpose of the bar examination be the same , what are we to infer when the law school graduate fails on the bar examination ? Nothing , certainly , when one fails ...
Page 196
... examination . Another expects to practice in Michigan and is taking a course in Detroit ; another who expects to ... examination about midway through their second year . Some of them attempt the December examination during that year ...
... examination . Another expects to practice in Michigan and is taking a course in Detroit ; another who expects to ... examination about midway through their second year . Some of them attempt the December examination during that year ...
Page 197
... examinations given during the law course and the grade made on the bar examination fail to agree . It has frequently been said that the record made on bar examinations by men who have had only two years of law work is better than the ...
... examinations given during the law course and the grade made on the bar examination fail to agree . It has frequently been said that the record made on bar examinations by men who have had only two years of law work is better than the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action admission adopted amendment American Annual Meeting applicants appoint approved Arlington attorney August authority Bar Association bill By-Laws called Chairman charge CHARLES Circuit client Code commissioner Constitution counsel County Court of Appeals desire District duty EDWARD effect elected evidence examination Executive Committee fact FRANK GEORGE give HENRY instructions interest JAMES JOHN JOSEPH Judge Judicial jury justice law school lawyer Legislation Lynchburg MARTIN matter membership ment motion Norfolk offered opinion passed person Point practice present President profession proposed question reason received recommendation record referred resolution RICHARD Richmond Roanoke ROBERT rules Sands seconded Secretary STUART suggested Supreme Court Tazewell thing THOMAS tion trial University Virginia Virginia State Bar Volume vote White Sulphur Springs WILLIAM