Report of the First[-thirty-first] Annual Meeting of the Virginia State Bar Association, Volume 49Virginia State Bar Association, 1937 - Bar associations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 15
Page 159
... applicants and an even greater effect on the percentage of successful applicants . This lends credence to the view once generally held by the poorly prepared applicant that he stood a much better chance of " getting by " if he took the ...
... applicants and an even greater effect on the percentage of successful applicants . This lends credence to the view once generally held by the poorly prepared applicant that he stood a much better chance of " getting by " if he took the ...
Page 160
... applicants , 82 % have had a minimum of two years in an approved law school . Based on these figures , your Committee estimates that the number of applicants will be reduced by about 10 % and the number of successful applicants by less ...
... applicants , 82 % have had a minimum of two years in an approved law school . Based on these figures , your Committee estimates that the number of applicants will be reduced by about 10 % and the number of successful applicants by less ...
Page 161
... applicants after July 1st of next year , the problem would solve itself . Perhaps the most pertinent inquiry is why there is such a wide variation between the different examinations in the ratio of total passing to total applicants ...
... applicants after July 1st of next year , the problem would solve itself . Perhaps the most pertinent inquiry is why there is such a wide variation between the different examinations in the ratio of total passing to total applicants ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action admission adopted amendment American Annual Meeting applicants appoint approved Arlington attorney August authority Bar Association bill By-Laws called Chairman charge CHARLES Circuit client Code commissioner Constitution counsel County Court of Appeals desire District duty EDWARD effect elected evidence examination Executive Committee fact FRANK GEORGE give HENRY instructions interest JAMES JOHN JOSEPH Judge Judicial jury justice law school lawyer Legislation Lynchburg MARTIN matter membership ment motion Norfolk offered opinion passed person Point practice present President profession proposed question reason received recommendation record referred resolution RICHARD Richmond Roanoke ROBERT rules Sands seconded Secretary STUART suggested Supreme Court Tazewell thing THOMAS tion trial University Virginia Virginia State Bar Volume vote White Sulphur Springs WILLIAM