Men and Thought in Modern History |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 78
Page
... have been purposely confined to very brief dimensions . Longer lists of books might easily have been supplied , but might have alarmed instead of inciting some readers . CONTENTS CHAPTER I ROUSSEAU AND HUMAN RIGHTS PAGE 1 CHAPTER PREFACE.
... have been purposely confined to very brief dimensions . Longer lists of books might easily have been supplied , but might have alarmed instead of inciting some readers . CONTENTS CHAPTER I ROUSSEAU AND HUMAN RIGHTS PAGE 1 CHAPTER PREFACE.
Page
Ernest Scott. CONTENTS CHAPTER I ROUSSEAU AND HUMAN RIGHTS PAGE 1 CHAPTER II VOLTAIRE AND FREEDOM OF THOUGHT 15 CHAPTER III NAPOLEON AND EFFICIENCY IN GOVERNMENT 29 • CHAPTER IV METTERNICH AND ABSOLUTISM 45 CHAPTER V. LOUIS BLANC AND THE ...
Ernest Scott. CONTENTS CHAPTER I ROUSSEAU AND HUMAN RIGHTS PAGE 1 CHAPTER II VOLTAIRE AND FREEDOM OF THOUGHT 15 CHAPTER III NAPOLEON AND EFFICIENCY IN GOVERNMENT 29 • CHAPTER IV METTERNICH AND ABSOLUTISM 45 CHAPTER V. LOUIS BLANC AND THE ...
Page 1
... human equality , the fundamental rights of mankind , and the contractual nature of human society , which are the three principal political ideas associated with his name . There are more persuasive statements of those doctrines than are ...
... human equality , the fundamental rights of mankind , and the contractual nature of human society , which are the three principal political ideas associated with his name . There are more persuasive statements of those doctrines than are ...
Page 3
... Human Equality ; but the principal piece was his Social Contract , which came from the press in 1762 . That compact little treatise , in its forty - eight very short chapters - some of which consist of only a few oracular paragraphs ...
... Human Equality ; but the principal piece was his Social Contract , which came from the press in 1762 . That compact little treatise , in its forty - eight very short chapters - some of which consist of only a few oracular paragraphs ...
Page 11
... Human rights , then , do not depend for their liberality , their beneficence , upon something inherent , which every person may claim by human prerogative in whatever kind of society he may be born . In some communities , as in Sparta ...
... Human rights , then , do not depend for their liberality , their beneficence , upon something inherent , which every person may claim by human prerogative in whatever kind of society he may be born . In some communities , as in Sparta ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
American Austria believed better Bismarck Britain British cause century CHAPTER church civilised Cobden colonies common Comte de Chambord Conservatism constitution criticism Darwin democracy democratic Disraeli doctrine economic Empire England English Europe fact force foreign policy France Free Trade French Germany Gladstone Herbert Spencer human ideas Imperial industry interests Italy John Stuart Mill kind King labour League League of Nations Liberal liberty Lincoln live Lord Louis Blanc mankind Marx Matthew Arnold Mazzini means ment Metternich Mill mind modern monarchical moral Morris Napoleon Napoleon III nation nature never opinion organisation Parliament party peace philosophical Political Economy President principle produced realised reason reform Republic Republican responsible government Revolution Rousseau slavery social Socialist society sovereign speeches Spencer statesmen things thought tion Tolstoy Tory true Utopia Voltaire Whig whole William Morris Woodrow Wilson writings wrote
Popular passages
Page 22 - And though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously by licensing and prohibiting to misdoubt her strength. Let her and Falsehood grapple. Who ever knew Truth put to the worse, in a free and open encounter ? Her confuting is the best and surest suppressing.
Page 71 - Hitherto it is questionable if all the mechanical inventions yet made have lightened the day's toil of any human being. They have enabled a greater population to live the same life of drudgery and imprisonment, and an increased number of manufacturers and others to make large fortunes.
Page 26 - He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side ; if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion.
Page 140 - This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing Government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it.
Page 138 - I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so; and I have no inclination to do so.
Page 110 - I confess I am not charmed with the ideal of life held out by those who think that the normal state of human beings is that of struggling to get on ; that the trampling, crushing, elbowing, and treading on each other's heels, which form the existing type of social life, are the most desirable lot of human kind, or anything but the disagreeable symptoms of one of the phases of industrial progress.
Page 146 - A majority held in restraint by constitutional checks and limitations, and always changing easily with deliberate changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free people. Whoever rejects it does, of necessity, fly to anarchy or to despotism. Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism in some form is all that is left.
Page 322 - We are now about to accept gauge of battle with this natural foe to liberty and shall, if necessary, spend the whole force of the Nation to check and nullify its pretensions and its power.
Page 200 - That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.