Failing Justice: Charles Evans Whittaker on the Supreme Court

Front Cover
McFarland, Jan 24, 2015 - History - 359 pages

In the history of the U.S. Supreme Court, Associate Justice Charles Evans Whittaker (1957-1962) merited several distinctions. He was the only Missourian and the first native Kansan appointed to the Court. He was one of only two justices to have served at both the federal district and appeals court levels before ascending to the Supreme Court. And Court historians have routinely rated him a failure as a justice.

This book is a reconsideration of Justice Whittaker, with the twin goals of giving him his due and correcting past misrepresentations of the man and his career. Based on primary sources and information from the Whittaker family, it demonstrates that Whittaker's life record is definitely not one of inadequacy or failure, but rather one of illness and difficulty overcome with great determination.

Nine appendices document all aspects of Whittaker's career. Copious notes, a selected bibliography, and two indexes complete a work that challenges the historical assessment of this public servant from Missouri.

From inside the book

Contents

Leaving the Farm
5
Thirty Years at the Bar
20
The Lower Courts
46
Arriving the Supreme at Court
82
Finding a Higher Law
127
Failing Justice
177
Speaking Out
226
Afterword
263
Clients of the Watson Law Firm
270
Opinions Rendered by Charles E Whittaker While Serving on the Lower Federal Courts
272
Justices Who Served with Justice Whittaker
275
Clerks Who Served with Justice Whittaker
276
Opinions Rendered by Justice Whittaker While Serving on the Supreme Court of the United States
278
Whittaker Award Recipients Through 2004
283
Chapter Notes
285
Select Bibliography
329

Whittakers Scheduled Classes for Law School
265
Growth of Large Law Firms in Kansas City
267
Changing Names of the Watson Law Firm
269
Case Index
339
Subject Index
344
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 164 - ... concurrent with the Court of Claims, of — (1) Any civil action against the United States for the recovery of any internal-revenue tax alleged to have been erroneously or illegally assessed or collected, or any penalty claimed to have been collected without authority or any sum alleged to have been excessive or in any manner wrongfully collected under the internal-revenue laws...
Page 297 - For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.
Page 326 - It is high time to challenge the assumption in which too many people have too long acquiesced, that groups that think they have been mistreated or that have actually been mistreated have a constitutional right to use the public's streets, buildings, and property to protest whatever, wherever, whenever they want, without regard to whom such conduct may disturb.
Page 187 - ... property passes or has passed (for less than an adequate and full consideration in money or money's worth) from the decedent to any person other than such surviving spouse (or the estate of such spouse) ; and...
Page 291 - The highest reward that can come to a lawyer is the esteem of his professional brethren. That esteem is won in unique conditions and proceeds from an impartial judgment of professional rivals. It cannot be purchased. It cannot be artificially created. It cannot be gained by artifice or contrivance to attract public attention. It is not measured by pecuniary gains. It is an esteem which...
Page 164 - US 489, is no longer law, the opinion of the much lamented Mr. Justice Jackson, based as it was on his great experience in tax litigation, has not lost its force insofar as it laid bare the complexities and perplexities for judicial construction of tax legislation. For one not a specialist in this field to examine every tax question that comes before the Court independently would involve in most cases an inquiry into the course of tax legislation and litigation far beyond the facts of the immediate...
Page 67 - The petitioner may have a constitutional right to talk politics, but he has no constitutional right to be a policeman.
Page 68 - US for refusing to sign an affidavit stating whether he was or ever had been a member of the Communist Party. The action was overturned by the Supreme Court in 1958.

About the author (2015)

Craig Alan Smith earned his Ph.D. in history and political science from the University of Missouri-Kansas City. He teaches American History and Social Studies Education at Missouri State University.

Bibliographic information