Page images
PDF
EPUB

sides, two or more directors, to preside in those sections of the offices of the Ministers and Secretaries of State which we shall think fit to leave on the spot for the administration of that part of our dominions. If the Governor is not a Prince, he shall be himself invested with the character of Minister Secretary of State, shall correspond directly with the Ministers and Secretaries of State whom we have with us, and shall have two or more directors for that purpose.

"Art. 6. (Makes the same regulations as the 5th, in respect to the government of Sicily, when the King resides on this side of the Straits.)

"Art. 7. These Directors, in both cases, shall be chosen promiscuously among all our subjects, as was fixed relatively to Sicily for the ancient offices of Consultator, of Conservator, which are replaced by the said di

[blocks in formation]

year the part of Sicily in the permanent expenses of the state, and we shall regulate the manner of its partition; but this annual part can never exceed the sum of 1,847,687 ounces and 20 tari, which was fixed in 1813 by the Parliament as the certain revenue of Sicily. No greater sum can by any means be imposed without the consent of Parliament.

"Art. 11. There shall be deducted every year from the said quota a sum which cannot be less than 150,000 ounces, which shall be applied to the payment of the debt bearing no interest, and of the arrear of interest of that which does bear interest, till the entire extinction of both: when these two debts are extinguished, this sum shall be annually employed in forming a sinking fund for the Sicilian debt.

"Art. 12. Till the general system of the civil and judicial administration of our kingdom of the Two Sicilies shall be promulgated, all the branches of justice and administration shall continue on the same footing as heretofore.

"We will and ordain, that the present law, signed by us, certified by our Council and our Minister of State Affairs of Grace and Justice, countersigned by our Council and the Chancellor Minister Secretary of State, enrolled and preserved in our general Chancery of the kingdom of the Two Sicilies, be pablished throughout the kingdom, with the ordinary solemnities, by the competent authorities, who shall draw up a proces verbal, and see to the execution of it. Our Chancellor, Minister of the kingdom 2 D

of

of the Two Sicilies, is specially
charged with this publication.
"Caserta, Dec. 12, 1916.
(Signed) "FERDINAND.

"The Minister of Grace
and Justice,
"MANHESE TOMMASI.
"The Minister Secretary
of State, Chancellor,
"TOMMASO DI SOMMA."

Copy of a Dispatch from his Excellency the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland to Lord Viscount Sidmouth, dated 5th of June, 1816, viz.

A Statement of the Nature and Extent of the Disturbances which have recently prevailed in Ireland, and the Measures which have been adopted by the Government of that Country in consequence thereof.Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed, 14th June

1816.

To the Right Hon. Lord Viscount Sidmouth: Dublin-Castle, 5th June 1816.

My Lord; I have had the honour of receiving your Lordship's letter of the 27th day of April, enclosing an Address from the House of Commons to his Royal Highness the Prince Regent, praying that his Royal Highness will be graciously pleased to direct that there be laid before the House a statement of the nature and extent of the disturbances which have recently prevailed in Ireland, and of the measures which have been adopted by the Government of that country in consequence thereof; and I proceed to obey the commands which your Lordship has signified to me

in that letter, that I should enable his Royal Highness to comply with the Address of the House of Commons.

Though I have, as your Lordship is well aware, apprized you from time to time of such events connected with the internal interests of Ireland as have been must worthy of notice, and of the measures which I have adopted with a view to restore and maintain the public peace, it may be satisfactory that I should (instead of referring your Lordship to the detail of my separate letters) embody the substance of them in this general dispatch.

It is not, I presume, wished that I should extend the statement which is required from me beyond the period at which I assumed the administration of the affairs of this country; and I shall, therefore, only shortly and generally refer to events which occurred during the government of my predecessor, or to the measures to which he had recourse.

The Insurrection Act was passed by the Legislature in the year 1807; it was not enforced on any occasion during the three years for which it was at that time enacted, and the state of Ireland was considered to be such in the year 1810, as not to render necessary the continuance of this act, and indeed to admit of its repeal a very short period before that to which its duration was limited by law.

In the early part, however, of January 1811, in consequence of the numerous outrages committed in the counties of Tipperary, Waterford. Kilkenny, and Limerick, by bodies of men who assembled

in arms by night, administered unlawful oaths, prescribed laws respecting the payinent of rents and tithes, plundered several houses of arms, in various instances attempted, and in some committed, murder; it was considered expedient to issue a warrant for a special commission, to be held in the counties before-mentioned, and in the cities of Waterford, Kilkenny, and Limerick, for the trial of such of the offenders as had been apprehended. From the evidence adduced at the Special Commission, it appeared that many of the outrages to which I have referred were committed by two combinations, very widely extended among the lower orders of the Roman Catholic population, which assumed the name of Caravats and Shanavests, respectively, and between which a violent animosity subsisted, the cause of which was not very satisfactorily accounted for. As feuds of the same kind, not growing out of religious differences, occasionally exist (though seldom to the extent to which this appears to have prevailed), I have inserted in the appendix to this dispatch a portion of the evidence which was adduced on one of the trials, from which some information may be collected with respect to the origin and object of the combinations, by which the peace of the country was at that time disturbed.

In the county of Tipperary nine persons were tried: two for murder, and seven for attempts to murder; five were tried for robbery of arms, and twenty-two indicted and tried under the acts which generally bear the name of the Riot and Whiteboy Acts, for

assuming the name of Caravats, and appearing in arms; six were sentenced to death, twenty-seven to transportation, whipping, and imprisonment, and three acquitted.

In Waterford twelve persons were tried; seven for attempts to murder, one for stealing arms, and four for burglary and robbery: they were all found guilty, and sentenced to death.

It was not thought necessary to proceed to Limerick in execution of the commission; and there were no trials of importance in Kilkenny.

Notwithstanding, however, the number of convictions in the counties of Tipperary and Waterford at the special commission, and the severe examples which were made, they do not appear even in those counties to have produced any lasting effect, or to have materially checked the bad spirit which prevailed in thein.

In the early part of 1813, and during the whole of that year, many daring offences against the public peace were committed in these and in other counties, particularly Waterford, Westmeath, Roscommon, and the King's county, the nature of which sufficiently proved that illegal combinations, and the same systematic violence and disorder against which the Special Commission of 1811 had been directed, still existed.

The offences against the public peace, committed in the counties which were the seats of disturbance, partook of the same general character; reports were constantly received of attacks on dwelling-houses for the purpose 2 D2

of

of procuring arms, and the frequency of these attacks, and the open and daring manuer in which they were made, were sufficient procfs of the desire which generally prevailed amongst those concerned in the disturbances to collect large quantities of arms, and thus possess the means of prosecuting their ulterior objects with a better prospect of success. Several instances occurred, in which the houses of respectable individuals were attacked, even in the open day, by large bodies of armed men; and others, in which the military, acting under the directions of magistrates, met with considerable resistance. It is worthy of remark, that in the many successful attacks which were made upon houses with the view of depriving the proprietors of their arms, it rarely occurred that any other specics of property was molested by the assailants.

The principal objects of hostility, or rather the principal sufferers on account of their inadequate means of defence, were those persons who, on the expiration of leases, had taken small farms at a higher rent than the late occupiers had offered; and all those who were suspected of a disposition to give information to magistrates against the disturbers of the peace, or to bear testimony against them in a court of justice, in the event of their apprehension and trial. In some counties, particularly in Westmeath and Roscommon, the most barbarous punishments were frequently inflicted upon the persons of those who had thus rendered

themselves obnoxious, and upon the persons of their relatives.*

From the general terror which these proceedings occasioned, it became almost impossible to procure satisfactory evidence against the guilty. It frequently happened that the sufferers from such atrocities as I have alluded to, when visited by a magistrate, would depose only generally to the facts of their having been perpetrated, and not denying their knowledge of the offenders, would yet steadily refuse to disclose their names, or describe their persons, from the fear of future additional injury to themselves or their relatives. Even where the parties offending were deposed against and apprehended, there was frequently the greatest difficulty in effecting their conviction, from the intimidation of witnesses, and in some cases of jurors.

I fear few instances can be found of late, in the counties which I have mentioned, in which it has been possible for witnesses, having given evidence in favour of the Crown, on any trial connected with the disturbance of the peace, to remain secure in their usual places of abode.

In the latter end of the year 1818, a meeting of the magistracy of the county of Westmeath took place, at which eighteen of that body attended. They addressed a

It is well known, that one of the com

binations existing in these and other neighbouring counties derived the name of Carders from the nature of the torture with visited, and which consisted in the lacerawhich the objects of its vengeance were tion of their bodies with a wool-card, or some similar instrument,

memorial

memorial to me respecting the state of that county, which bears date the 29th November; they represented that frequent outrages were committed; that oaths of increased malignity had been administered; that three persons had been convicted on charges of

In the

from

magis

that

for an increase to the force stationed in them. Memorial which I received the King's County, which bore the signature of sixteen trates, it was stated, alarming disturbances existed in that county, and the adjacent parts administering and taking an oath, of Westmeath: that almost every night houses were plundered of arms; that they : stronger measures

than

idered

those

under

which could be resorted to
the existing laws absolute}
cessary; and that the
ment and enforcement

one of the obligations of which
was "to assist the French and
Buonaparte ;" and that the wit-
ness upon whose evidence that
conviction had taken place had
been recently murdered, under
circumstances which were alone
sufficient to prove the alarm-surrection Act would
ing state of that county. The me-
morial concluded with an earnest
prayer, that a proposition might
be made to the Legislature for
the revival of the Insurrection

Act.

From evidence adduced on the trial of six persons concerned in the murder alluded to in this Memo

them to maintain tranc

[ocr errors]

ena 3Se la

is14, sand County

In the month of Jaz
I received from the gove
28 of the magistrates of t
of Westmeath a second emorial,
urging the necessity of the in-
mediate revival of the Insurrec-
tion Act.

In this county three

murders had been then recent y Irial (five of whom were capitally committed within the short space convicted), it was proved, that the of a month, two upon murder was committed by a party suspected of giving of eighteen men selected from a against offenders. larger body who assembled in

[ocr errors]

information

Your Lordship will

recollect,

divisions of 12 each from three that in the early part of January separate parishes, for the purpose 1814, I felt it incumbent upon

murder.

to a

of planning and perpetrating this me to call your attention
I may also add, that representation made to your Lord-
nine persons were shortly after- ship by his Gmee the Duke f
wards convicted on the same Richmond, he month of d

charges with respect to the oath get eating, m the subiect of

on which the convictions mentioned in the memorial of the L gistrates took place.

Similar meetings of the mus trates of Waterford and of the King's County took place mor the same time, and I reserva from both representations of te disturbed state of their erectiv

counties, and earnest pricato:

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]

aterr

-

[ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

essity ice in inary be en

ression

d long of Mid

1 coun

cil,

« PreviousContinue »