Report of the First[-thirty-first] Annual Meeting of the Virginia State Bar Association, Volume 38 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 37
Page 73
And so with all of the thirty - six , that they would carry the interests of those they represented in their minds . Don't you believe it ? I do . If I thought you could get together thirty - six members of the circuit bars of the State ...
And so with all of the thirty - six , that they would carry the interests of those they represented in their minds . Don't you believe it ? I do . If I thought you could get together thirty - six members of the circuit bars of the State ...
Page 242
Ayers was represented by Roscoe Conkling , of New York , John Randolph Tucker , C. V. Meredith and W. W. Gordon , of Virginia . The bondholders were represented by Wm . L. Royall and D. H. Chamberlain . The opinion of the court was ...
Ayers was represented by Roscoe Conkling , of New York , John Randolph Tucker , C. V. Meredith and W. W. Gordon , of Virginia . The bondholders were represented by Wm . L. Royall and D. H. Chamberlain . The opinion of the court was ...
Page 459
A lawyer should not in any way communicate upon the subject of controversy with a party represented by counsel ; much less should he undertake to negotiate or compromise the matter with him , but should deal only with his counsel .
A lawyer should not in any way communicate upon the subject of controversy with a party represented by counsel ; much less should he undertake to negotiate or compromise the matter with him , but should deal only with his counsel .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action active admission adopted amendment American annual meeting application appointed approval Assembly attendance authority Bar Association believe bill Board body called cause Chairman charges CHARLES Circuit Code Commissioners Committee conduct Constitution Corporation Council Court of Appeals directed discussion District duty effect elected evidence Examiners Executive fact fees five GEORGE give going held HENRY interest JAMES JOHN Judge judicial jury justice lawyer legislation legislature Lynchburg matter membership ment Norfolk Norfolk Norfolk opinion organization paid person practice present President profession proposed question reason receive referred regulations represented resolution respect Richmond Richmond Richmond Roanoke ROBERT rules salaries Secretary Section Senator session standing suggested Supreme Court thereof thing THOMAS tion trial United Virginia State Bar Volume vote