Report of the First[-thirty-first] Annual Meeting of the Virginia State Bar Association, Volume 38 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 36
Page 221
If it would not be asking too much - it may be that some of our brethren here do not know - I would like to hear some statement of how far the proposed amendment would carry into effect the purpose that was in the mind of Judge Prentis ...
If it would not be asking too much - it may be that some of our brethren here do not know - I would like to hear some statement of how far the proposed amendment would carry into effect the purpose that was in the mind of Judge Prentis ...
Page 356
It is believed that the effect of these provisions is simply to declare that failure on the part of the driver to comply with the act shall not constitute contributory negligence per se , but that such failure would be competent ...
It is believed that the effect of these provisions is simply to declare that failure on the part of the driver to comply with the act shall not constitute contributory negligence per se , but that such failure would be competent ...
Page 358
A similar situation arose this year in connection with the new automobile law and the question of the effect of the omission of an enacting clause from that law has been of wide interest throughout the State . The attorney general has ...
A similar situation arose this year in connection with the new automobile law and the question of the effect of the omission of an enacting clause from that law has been of wide interest throughout the State . The attorney general has ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action active admission adopted amendment American annual meeting application appointed approval Assembly attendance authority Bar Association believe bill Board body called cause Chairman charges CHARLES Circuit Code Commissioners Committee conduct Constitution Corporation Council Court of Appeals directed discussion District duty effect elected evidence Examiners Executive fact fees five GEORGE give going held HENRY interest JAMES JOHN Judge judicial jury justice lawyer legislation legislature Lynchburg matter membership ment Norfolk Norfolk Norfolk opinion organization paid person practice present President profession proposed question reason receive referred regulations represented resolution respect Richmond Richmond Richmond Roanoke ROBERT rules salaries Secretary Section Senator session standing suggested Supreme Court thereof thing THOMAS tion trial United Virginia State Bar Volume vote