Report of the First[-thirty-first] Annual Meeting of the Virginia State Bar Association, Volume 38 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 59
Page 78
I am opposed to it because I believe it will sound the death knell of the Virginia State Bar Association . We can scarcely get one hundred and fifty of the eight hundred members to attend this meeting , and we cannot go out into the ...
I am opposed to it because I believe it will sound the death knell of the Virginia State Bar Association . We can scarcely get one hundred and fifty of the eight hundred members to attend this meeting , and we cannot go out into the ...
Page 230
After all this discussion I cannot help but believe that the objects of this proposal are still to some extent misunderstood by the judges and the profession . If I understand the bill , it has two features . First , the law now is that ...
After all this discussion I cannot help but believe that the objects of this proposal are still to some extent misunderstood by the judges and the profession . If I understand the bill , it has two features . First , the law now is that ...
Page 231
Now I believe , as Judge Anderson says , that it will be a long , long time before we will ever get the bar of Virginia to approve that bill . But I do not believe , because of that situation , we should turn aside from our efforts to ...
Now I believe , as Judge Anderson says , that it will be a long , long time before we will ever get the bar of Virginia to approve that bill . But I do not believe , because of that situation , we should turn aside from our efforts to ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action active admission adopted amendment American annual meeting application appointed approval Assembly attendance authority Bar Association believe bill Board body called cause Chairman charges CHARLES Circuit Code Commissioners Committee conduct Constitution Corporation Council Court of Appeals directed discussion District duty effect elected evidence Examiners Executive fact fees five GEORGE give going held HENRY interest JAMES JOHN Judge judicial jury justice lawyer legislation legislature Lynchburg matter membership ment Norfolk Norfolk Norfolk opinion organization paid person practice present President profession proposed question reason receive referred regulations represented resolution respect Richmond Richmond Richmond Roanoke ROBERT rules salaries Secretary Section Senator session standing suggested Supreme Court thereof thing THOMAS tion trial United Virginia State Bar Volume vote