...commerce and cars might come from other States. The defense in that case was that the order placed a burden upon inter-State commerce, in violation of the commerce clause of the Federal constitution, but it was held that the State had authority to regulate rates for transportation...

...ground that the assumption of jurisdiction by the court in such cases would impose an unreasonable burden .upon interstate commerce in violation of the commerce clause of the federal Constitution (Const, art. 1, § 8, cl. 3). This contention is based upon the fact that the...

...business whatsoever before complying with its terms. This was clearly an unwarranted attempt to place a burden upon interstate commerce in violation of the commerce clause of the United States Constitution. No clearer distinction between these cases can be drawn than that contained in Osborne...

...because of their being extensively engaged in interstate commerce, and was intended to be and is a burden upon interstate commerce, in violation of the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution. Brimmer v. Rebman, 138 US 78; Galveston &c. Ry. Co. v. Texas, 210 US 217; McCulloch...

...because of their being extensively engaged in interstate commerce, and was intended to be and is a burden upon interstate commerce, in violation of the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution. Brimmer v. Rebman, 138 US 78; Galveston &c. Ry. Co. v. Texas, 210 US 217; McCulloch...

...relief granted. The next proposition of counsel is that the order discriminates against and places a burden upon interstate commerce, in violation of the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution, and is therefore unreasonable, unlawful, and void. Neither the complaint nor...

...commerce and cars might come from other states. The defense in that case was that the order placed a burden upon interstate commerce, in violation of the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution; but it was held that the state had authority to regulate rates for transportation...

...provisions shall apply only to products sold in intrastate commerce, the statute does in fact impose a burden upon interstate commerce in violation of the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution. The contention made by the plaintiffs on this score and the answer made to it...

...ground that the assumption of jurisdiction by the court in such cases would impose an unreasonable burden upon interstate commerce in violation of the commerce clause of the federal Constitution (Const, art. 1, § 8, cl. 3). This contention is based upon the fact that the...

...the hiring of flight crew personnel of an interstate air carrier because to do so would constitute an undue burden upon interstate commerce in violation of the commerce clause of the Constitution, and because the field of law concerning racial discrimination in the interstate operation...