Page images
PDF
EPUB

THIERS' HISTORY OF THE CONSULATE AND THE EMPIRE OF FRANCE UNDER NAPOLEON, the late Mr. Colburn's authorized library edition, in 8vo. in large type. Vol. 12, price 58.

NOTICE.

Messrs. Willis and Sotheran beg respectfully to announce that they have just purchased the entire Stock and Copyright of the authorized library edition of the above valuable work, which will be continued and completed as early as possible after the publication of the original in France. Vols. 1 to 12 are now ready, price 5s each; Vol. 13 is in course of translation, and the entire work will be completed in 15 vols. Those gentlemen who do not at present possess the first 11 vols. as published by Mr. Colburn, can by giving their names to W. and S. as subscribers to the 12th and concluding volumes, be supplied with Vols. I. to XI. at half price, namely, for £1. 78 6d, instead of the published price of £2. 158.

"Of his great and singular ability, this work is a new and convincing proof. His high administrative talents; his wonderful clearness and facility of detail: and that quality of calm, cold, eloquent good sense which makes his oratory in the Chamber of Deputies as unassuming as it is powerful, are prominently impressed."-The Examiner.

"The sale of this work has been unprecedented, ten thousand copies, it is said, have been sold in one day. The third edition is now publishing in France, whilst in neighbouring countries authorized translations, like the present, or pirated facsimiles, issue simultaneously from the press. We readily conceive this curiosity, and believe that time will not deprive the work of its interest, but that no library of any magnitude will be thought complete without this addition."-Post.

"The publication of M. Thiers' History of the Consulate and the Empire is an event of interest not confined to the world of literature. The charms of so facile a style, the method of so lucid a narrative, and the abundance of its authentic and hitherto unexplored materials, place this work amongst the most important productions of our time. During the course of his inquiries on the subject, the ex-Minister has had free access to many sources of information beyond the reach of every other biographer of Napoleon. As keeper of the State Paper-office (gardien de l'arche), he has ranged at will over its stores, and been able to consult a mass of diplomatic papers and other documents, the very existence of which was hitherto known only to a privileged few. Many interesting memoirs, diaries, and letters-all hitherto unpublished, and most of them destined for political reasons to remain so-have been placed at his disposal; while all the leading characters of the empire who were alive when the anthor undertook the present history, have supplied him with a mass of incidents and anecdotes which have never before appeared in print, and the accuracy and value of which may be inferred from the fact of these parties having been themselves eye-witnesses of, or actors in, the great events of the period.”—Times.

Early English Chronicles,

PUBLISHED BY THE ENGLISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY.

A complete set of these valuable Publications, on LARGE PAPER, 29 vols. royal 8vo. finely printed on thick paper, neatly bound in vellum bds. lettered, only £15. Lond. 1838-56

Of the above edition of these valuable Old Chronicles, Histories, and Documents, many of which are now printed for the first time, only 200 copies were printed for the use of the Members of the English Historical Society. Their value cannot be overrated, containing as they do a greater mass of information on our Early History than can be obtained in any other works, and edited as they are by some of the most eminent scholars of the present day.

"The extraordinary amount of information to be derived from these documents renders their publication an era in the studies of Teutonic scholars; for law, language, and history, they are full of data, without which no inquiry in this field, however industrious and conscientious, could possibly be successful. Germany and Scandinavia have their part too in the collection."-Preface to Codex Dipl. Evi Sax.

CONTENTS:

Venerabilis Bedæ Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorum,
edidit Joseph Stevenson.

Venerabilis Bedæ Opera, Historica Minora, ed. Stevenson.
Chronicon Ricardi Divisiensis de Rebus Gestis Ricardi Primi
Regis Angliæ, edidit Stevenson. Never before printed,
Gildas de Excidio Britanniæ, edidit Josephus Stevenson.
Nennii Historia Britonum, edidit Josephus Stevenson.
Codex Diplomaticus Evi Saxonici, opera Johannis M.
Kemble, 6 vols. Never before printed.
Willelmi Malmesbiriensis Monachi Gesta Regum Anglorum
atque Historia Novella, recensuit T. D. Hardy, 2 vols.
Rogeri de Wendover Chronica, sive Flores Historiarum, cum
Appendice, ed. H. O. Coxe, 5 vols. Never before printed.
Adami Murimuthensis Chronica sui Temporis, 1303-1380,
recensuit Thomas Hog.

Gesta Stephani, Regis Anglorum et Ducis Normannorum,
recensuit R. C. Sewell, D.C.L.

Nicholai Triveti, de Ordine Fratrum Prædicatorum, Annales
Sex Regum Angliæ, 1136-1307, recensuit T. Hog.
Chronicque de la Traison et Mort de Richart Deux Roy
d'Engleterre, mise en Lumière d'après un Manuscrit de
la Bibliothèque Royale de Paris, avec les variantes four-
nies par dix autres Manuscrits, des Eclaircissements et un
Glossaire, par B. Williams, F.S.A. Never before printed.
Florentii Wigorniensis Monachi Chronicon ex Chronicis,
ad fidem Codd. MSS. edidit B. Thorpe. 2 vols.
Chronicon Walteri de Hemingburgh de Gestis Regum
Angliæ, ad fidem Codd. MSS., recensuit H. C. Hamilton.
2 vols.
Henrici Quinti Angliæ Regis Gesta, recensuit B. Williams.
Historia Rerum Anglicarum Wilhelmi Parvi, S.T.D. Ordinis
Sancti Augustini Canonici Regularis in Cœnobio Beatse
Mariæ de Novaburgo in Agro Eboracensi, recensuit H.
C. Hamilton. 2 vols.

The cost to each Member, of the above set of works, was upwards of Sixty Guineas.

1856

23-6-190.

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

OXFORDSHIRE PAROCHIAL MEMORANDA.

In Current Notes, pp. 30-31, are some interesting memoranda relative to the manor of Glympton. The earliest Register book of that parish, made of parchment, does not commence till "the 25th of June, in the year of our Lord, 1667;" one hundred and twenty-nine years after the issuing of the injunction by Thomas Lord Cromwell, for the keeping of registers. Possibly the following extracts, which with many others, by the kind permission of the late Rev. T. Nucella, I made from that register may be worth adding.

At p. 23, is an entry made by the rector, it appears in 1686, 2 James II., to the following effect.

Memorandum: Least the not demanding any other offerings att Easter then what are given att the Sacrament should be thought a neglect of mine, I am concerned to leave to my successors, this account which I had from some of the most understanding of the parish.

Whereas anciently there was a barbarous custom here for all the house-keepers, and which is worse the (judicious) rabble, to come to the Minister's house on Easterday after the Sacrament, to demand bread and cheese, and drink themselves full of ale, and in process of time, meate, pigeon pyes, etc. This rudeness was broken off by way of exchange, that is, the quitting the Easter two-pences; and whereas long afterward, my predecessor demanded Easter-offerings, the parish came and demanded their ancient custom, which he was forced and glad to be ridden of. This I had from the mouth of an honest neighbour, who was one of those who came to demand it.

Ita est STEPH. PENTON, Rector. Under another heading there is a subsequent reference.

CUSTOMES AND USAGES IN GLYMPTON.

1. A Fee Farm: rent payable at Michaelmas to Mr. Samuel Barton. 6s. 8d. 2. A dinner at Christmas, not on any certain day, for such house-keepers as take no almes.

3. The poor who take alms, have one peck of wheat, and one shilling.

4. Noe two-pences demanded att Easter, above the ordinary Oblations att the Sacrament, for a reason ascertained at p. 23. [As above.]

The Glympton register, with many others in the north of Oxfordshire, which I have examined, contains items relative to the sums being collected for the redemption of the English who were captives and in slavery in Turkey; a curious contrast with the present state of the two countries. C. FAULKNER.

Deddington, May 12.

VOL. VI.

[MAY, 1856.

ST. ANDREW'S OLD CHURCH, PORTLAND. This edifice, at the southern extremity of the island, very near to the sea, was erected and dedicated to St. Andrew, in 1475. The tower was plain, and had no bell, it was detached by nearly three feet from the body of the church. The woodcut is from a very old drawing of the principal entrance; inscribed over the doorwayPsalmes the 122. I was glad when they said unto me, Let us go into the house of the Lord.

Alex. Pearce. Phil. Dorent. Churchwardens, 1686.

[graphic][subsumed][ocr errors][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

that this church was then in a ruinous condition, oc-
casioned by several settlements in the foundation from
time to time; further, that it was in a very dangerous
situation, the cliff having fallen into the sea, by which
the verge of the remaining part was within thirty-six
feet of the foundation; upon these representations, the
demolition of the old and much decayed church was com-
menced in 1754, and the materials used in the new one.
Dorchester, May 2.
JOHN GARLAND.

TRADITION OF RICHARD THE THIRD'S BEDSTEAD.

A paragraph in Current Notes, p. 27, has recalled to my mind a circumstance communicated to me some years since, by an eminent English antiquary, respecting the bedstead on which Richard the Third slept, August 21, 1485, on the night previous to the battle of Bosworth Field, at the Blue Boar Inn, Leicester. The bedstead so occupied by the king, according to my informant, is still extant, the history of which, as related by Sir Roger Twysden, is not a little curious.

When King Richard marched into Leicestershire against Henry Earl of Richmond, he lay at the Blue Boar Inn, in the town of Leicester, where a large wooden bedstead, gilded in some places, after his defeat, the bedding being all taken from it, was either through haste, or as a thing of little value, left to the people of the house. Thenceforward this old bedstead, which was boarded at the bottom, as the manner was in those days, became a piece of standing furniture, and passed from tenant to tenant with the inn. This house, in the reign of Queen Elizabeth, was kept by one Clarke, who put a bed on this bedstead, which, his wife going to make hastily, and tumbling the bedstead, a piece of gold dropped out, this excited the woman's curiosity: she narrowly examined this piece of furniture, and finding it had a double bottom, took off the uppermost with a chisel, upon which she discovered the space between them filled with gold; part of it coined by King Richard III., and the rest in earlier times. Clarke concealed this good fortune, though by degrees the effect made it known, for from a low condition, he became rich, and in the space of a few years, Mayor of the town, and then the story of the bedstead came to be rumoured by the servants. At his death, he left his estate to his wife, who continued to keep the inn, though she was known to be very rich, which put some wicked persons upon engaging the maid-servant to assist in robbing her. These folks to the number of seven, lodged in the house, plundered it, and carried off some horse loads of valuable things, yet left a considerable quantity of valuables scattered about the floor. As for Mrs. Clarke, who was very fat, she endeavoured to cry out for help, upon which her maid thrust her fingers down her throat, and choaked her, for which act she was burnt, and the seven men who were her accomplices, were hanged at Leicester, some time in the year

1613.

have been secreted where it was subsequently discovered,
by the king himself, to be available for his purposes
after
the battle.
Could Mr. Kelly, or any reader of Current Notes
say what has become of this bedstead, or in whose pos-
session it now remains?

King Richard's body after the battle, was, it is as-
serted, exposed for some time, and then buried in the
church of the Grey Friars, in Leicester. It is also
stated, that King Henry VII. bestowed a monument
upon his rival, which, on the dissolution of religious
houses by Henry VIII., was demolished, and Richard's
stone coffin actually served for a horse trough, at the
White Horse Inn, in Leicester.
Downpatrick, May 1.
JAMES A. PILSON.

The tradition quoted by your correspondent, Mr. J. A. PILSON, is well known in this locality, and generally speaking is, in all its details, as an article of faith, popularly believed. Sir Roger Twysden, in his Decem Scriptores, 1652, first placed these assertions upon record; and he is said to have "had it from persons of undoubted credit, who were not only inhabitants of Leicester, but who saw the murderers executed," and from him, these assertions have been transmitted by subsequent writers, down to Miss Halstead, in whose biography of Richard III., they have been garnished by some slight poetical embellishments. The advance however that has been made of late years in the study of archæology, and the distinguished characteristics of architecture, furniture, and moveables, has been the means of exposing many falsely supposed reliques, and the so long vaunted King Richard the Third's bedstead is among the number. Among the most prominent of those who expressed their doubts on the subject, was Mr. J. G. Nichols, who, proceeding to the opposite extreme, in an article some years since in the Gentleman's Magazine, and more recently in the Literary Remains of Mr. J. S. Hardy, edited by him, endeavoured to prove that the whole tradition, which rested solely on the authority of Sir Roger Twysden, was nothing more than "an old wife's tale," nay, that the king never slept at the Blue Boar at all; and still more, that there was no such inn at Leicester.

Without attempting a thorough investigation of these assertions, I shall content myself with noticing the more salient points of the story, and of Mr. Nichols's doubts. That the Blue Boar Inn at Leicester, was well known in the reign of Queen Elizabeth there are ample documentary proofs; whilst the traditionary story of the murder of Mrs. Clarke, has since the publication of Mr. Nichols's denial of the fact, been confirmed in the main relation, by the discovery in the Borough Munisub-ment Room, of the original depositions of the witnesses in the case, taken before the Justices of the Peace, at the time of the murder. From these documents, the following facts are derived :—

In addition to the foregoing statement by Sir Roger Twysden, I have heard that the bedstead was sequently possessed by one Alderman Drake; I am however of opinion, that it is not at all likely such a piece of furniture would or could be carried about, by a person like Richard III.; it is far more probable that it had been the best in the inn, and that the gold might

Shortly before Christmas, 1603, one Thomas Harrison came out of Staffordshire to Leicester, and lodged

1

for several days at the Blue Boar Inn, then kept by Mrs. | declared that "for his part he did Mrs. Clarke no harm,
Clarke. He there fell in speech with Alice Grumbold,
a maid of the house, in the way of marriage. Where-
upon, she told him, "her mistress had great store of
money in her house, and bade him come again some
night and bring a secret friend with him she might trust,
and there would be means made to get some of her
money." Harrison proceeded to Lichfield, and took into
his confidence Adam Bonus, who communicated the plan
of the robbery to one Edward Bradshaw, and they ar-
ranged to meet at Leicester, and carry it into effect.
Accordingly, Harrison and Bradshaw, on Friday,
ruary 1, 1604, rode to Leicester, and on the following
day, they removed with their horses to the Blue Boar
Inn, lay there all night, and staid all day, on Sunday.
In the mean time Bonus, who had appointed to meet the
others at the Blue Boar, came on Saturday to Leicester,
and after some conversation with Alice Grumbold, in the
absence of Harrison and Bradshaw, determined not to
take part in the intended robbery; and in fact after the
murder, he turned 'king's evidence.'

nor did so much as think to kill or hurt her, but what
Bradshaw did he knew not; for to his knowledge, she
was living at their going away." He added, Alice
Grumbold, "the maid, was the only setter of the match,
for they had not dealt therein but by her procurement."
She however protested, that although she could not clear
herself from the robbery and consenting thereto, she was
clear from the murder of her mistress, and asserted "in
her conscience Bradshaw did murder her."
The plunder bore off by these robbers was never re-
Feb-covered, they declared they did not know what the bags
contained, silver or gold, for in their flight, it was hidden
by them in the bank of a ditch near Pooley park, in
Warwickshire, but they believed, if it consisted of silver,
there was from three to five hundred pounds. Being
apprehended on some other charge and imprisoned,
Bradshaw, through the instrumentality of Lord Stafford,*
was bailed, and on his going to the ditch side for the
money, found it had been removed.

They were subsequently apprehended on the charge of the murder of Mrs. Clarke, and brought to Leicester. The result of the trial appears on record among our Hall papers, in the following notice, on a slip of parchment :

:

Our Assizes holden at Leicester upon Tuesday, March 25, 1606, before Sir Peter Warburton, Knt.; at which Assizes Edward Bradshaw was executed for murthering Mrs. Clarke, and Alice Grumbolde burned for the same murther.' Harrison's fate is not recorded.

Twysden, it is evident, errs in the date assigned by him, and two, not seven men were concerned with the maid Alice, in this diabolical act. The particulars ad

The particulars of the murder are these-Alice Grumbold deposed, that about ten o'clock on Sunday night, Feb. 3, she and her fellow servant, Waters, went into the stable with provender for the horses, and that Bradshaw and Harrison followed them; she then went to the well to draw water for the horses, Bradshaw at the same time returning to the house, where they had left the mistress all alone. On returning to the stable, she found her fellow-servant bound, and Harrison, doubtless according to previous arrangement, seized and bound her also. She was soon however, unbound, and seemingly by force taken by them into the house, to open her mis-vanced however establish the tradition as based on fact. tress's coffers, the first of which was full of linen; the second, full of writings; and the third, contained money. From this last, they took out several bags of money, most of which, having previously brought out their horses, they fastened to the pommels of their saddles. Alice would gladly have gone away with them, whereat they swore by God's wounds, if thou comest with us, thou wilt both hang us and thyself." They then took her into the hall, and there bound her; Harrison at the same time gave her a linen cloth, wherein was money and other things, and said he would in ten days, come again, to fetch her and it. The money she had was 427. 17s., beside two silver rings, and a gold ring. In her second examination, she added, that after she was left bound in the chimney in the hall, her legs not being fast bound, she got up, and went into the buttery to see how her mistress did, where, being unable to get out again, she lay till morning, when one of the neighbours came into the house to light a candle, and unbound her. Beside the plunder carried off, it appears there were seven or eight bags of money or gold,' and certain plate were left behind on Mrs. Clarke's bed. As to the actual perpetration of the murder, no direct evidence appears, possibly the account as narrated by Sir Roger Twisden, may be the fact, and the circumstance of the maid's choaking her mistress, may probably be true. Harrison

[ocr errors]

The story of King Richard's bedstead, and the discovery of the treasure secreted within it, rests wholly on tradition. That, now recognized as King Richard's bedstead, is indisputably a fine specimen of the late Elizabethan style, and has no concurrent similitude with those constructed more than a century before. Twysden's statement that "from a low condition Clarke soon became rich, and in the course of a few years, Mayor of the Town," would seem to be a recapitulation of some locally accredited belief, while it affords no evidence as to the discovery of the gold in the way related by those who placed credence in the tradition. Thomas Clarke mine host of the Blue Boar Inn, from the mode in which the money and valuables was garnered by Mrs. Clarke, was possibly of thrifty habit, might have inherited property from relations, or from his long and constant success as an innkeeper; still, certain it is that Thomas Clarke was mayor of Leicester, in 1598-9, and was an illiterate character, unable to subscribe his name. By his will, dated June 15, 1603, he bequeathed part of his property to charitable uses, and died a few days later in that month. Search has been made in the Archdeaconry Court for his will, in the hope that the inventory attached to it would afford some fact illustrative of the history of

* Edward Stafford, the third baron, who died in 1625.

the bedstead, but the roll for that year is missing. These facts are suggestive, that Clarke during his mayoralty might have had this bedstead constructed for his use; and on his year of official greatness expiring, it was moved to his inn. The murder of his widow in February, 1604, doubtless placed the inn in other hands, and they possibly to draw custom created the fable of Richard having sought repose in that inn, and as any bedstead would answer the purpose, exhibited that on which possibly the ex-mayor died in 1603. This was a period of poetical fancies, the story of Dick Whittington and his Cat had its origin at this time; these romances spread far and wide, and were as eagerly credited by all classes of persons, the more incredible and strange they were in their purport, they were found to be vastly more agreeable, and in some panegyrical lines by an anonymous writer, prefixed to Tom Coryate's Crudities, printed in 1611; there are recounted among the 'penny sights' then popular in England, in London, and elsewhere, the following:

The lance of John o'Gaunt, and Brandon's still i'the Tower,
The fall of Nineveh, and Norwich built in an hower;
King Henry's slip shoes, the sword of valiant Edward,
The Coventry Boare's shield, and fireworks seen but to
bedward:

Drake's ship at Deptford, King Richard's bed sted i Leyster,
The White Hall whale bones, the silver bason i'Chester.

The bedstead, after having been for several generations in the family of Babington, of Rothley, has lately passed by purchase into the possession of W. Perry Herrick, Esq., of Beaumanor Park, in this county.

There are some other curious matters connected with the subject which would have been worth noting, irrespective of King Richard; among them, the charge of treason, which a few years previously had been brought against Mrs. Clarke, when Mayoress, for having said, 'the Queen deserved a rope, etc.,' as also, the particulars of the attempt to procure by bribery, through Lord Stafford, a pardon for Bradshaw.

Leicester, May 10.

WILLIAM KELLY.

[blocks in formation]

VESPASIAN.-The March number of Current Notes, p. 27, notices the discovery of a gold coin of Vespasian at Inveresk; the legend on the reverse, reading Cos ITER TR. POT. Last month, another of identically the same type, and in fine condition, was dug up on the site of a camp near Hawick. The fact of these two coins being discovered within three weeks, in different parts of Scotland, appears to be deserving of note.

Edinburgh. BARRON GRAHAME, F.S.A., Scotland.

STONE CARVING IN GLASGOW CATHEDRAL.

Your Correspondent's notice in Current Notes, p. 39, of the curious corbel in Brechin cathedral, reminds me of a stone carving in one of the crypts of the cathedral at Glasgow; and at this time when the north-landers are apparently about to repair their beautiful church, it may not be altogether useless to caution them not to deal too carelessly with the fragmentary stones lying in the crypts, now wisely left there for inspection, and perhaps might be so placed, that visitors might study them with more convenience.

The stone, of which the enclosed is a correct sketch

[graphic][merged small][merged small]

NOTES BY A NUMISMATIST.

ROMAN MINT AT ARLES CALLED, CONSTANTINA.

In the Sale Catalogue of the Collection of the late Mr. H. P. Borrell, of Smyrna, to lot 834, consisting of twenty-five varieties of third brass coins of the period of the Constantine Family, is the following note

ters are CONS. On one of the coins of Fausta, the exergual or mint letThe Baron Marchant remarked a similar example, which he thought singular, because Fausta died before Byzantium was called Constantinople; but the late Mr. Borrell, in his numismatic correspondence with the writer, expressed an opinion that these coins were struck at Arles; for Le Beau, in his History of the Lower empire, expressly tells us that in 316, Constantine visited Gaul, and having conferred many benefits upon the City of Arles, it took the name of Constantine in gratitude to its benefactor; and Fausta, was born there in the same year, or fourteen moreover, Constantine Junior, the eldest son of Constantine years before Byzantium was called Constantinople. As to these coins having been struck in her honour, after her death, except indeed by her sons, that is not probable.

« PreviousContinue »