 | Alexander Jamieson - Logic - 1822 - 312 pages
...can- not be divided, or that cannot consist of parts. A part of you or of me, is a manifest absurdity. When a man loses his estate, his health, his strength,...before. A person is something indivisible, and is v/hat LEIBNITZ calls a monad. 400. Any personal identity, therefore, implies the continued existence... | |
 | Thomas Brown - Philosophy - 1822 - 552 pages
...something, that cannot be divided or consist of parts. A part of a person is a manifest absurdity. '• When a man loses his estate, his health, his strength,...same person, and has lost nothing of his personality. If he has a leg or an arm cut off, he is the same person he was before. The amputated member is no... | |
 | Thomas Brown - Philosophy - 1824 - 468 pages
...engagements ; it would be entitled to a share of his merit and demerit, which is manifestly absurd. A person is something indivisible, and is what Leibnitz calls a monad."* That all mankind place their personality in something, which Giu mot be divided into two persons, or... | |
 | Thomas Brown - Philosophy - 1826 - 548 pages
...engagements ; it would be entitled to a share of his merit and demerit, which is manifestly absurd. A person is something indivisible, and is what Leibnitz calls a monad."* That all mankind place their personality in something, which cannot be divided into two persons, or... | |
 | Thomas Reid - Act (Philosophy). - 1827 - 706 pages
...in something that cannot be divided or consist of parts. A part of a person is a manifest absurdity. When a man loses his estate, his health, his strength,...same person, and has lost nothing of his personality. If he has a leg or an arm cut off, he is the same person he was before. The amputated member is no... | |
 | Alexander Jamieson - Logic - 1835 - 312 pages
...be divided, or that cannot consist of parts. A part of you or of me, is a manifest absurdity. Illus. When a man loses his estate, his health, his strength,...of his personality. The Marquis of Anglesea lost a lee at the battle of Waterloo, but he is the same person he was before. A person is something indivisible,... | |
 | Thomas Brown, David Welsh - Intellect - 1846 - 580 pages
...something that cannot be divided or consist of parts. A part of a person is a manifest absurdity. " When a man loses his estate, his health, his strength,...same person, and has lost nothing of his personality. If he has a leg or an arm cut oS, he is the same person he was before. The amputated member is no part... | |
 | Thomas Reid - 1846 - 1080 pages
...something that cannot be divided, or consist of parts. A part of a person is a manifest absurdity. When a man loses his estate, his health, his strength,...same person, and has lost nothing of his personality. If he has a leg or an arm cut off, he is the same person he was before. The amputated member is no... | |
 | Hubbard Winslow - History - 1853 - 432 pages
...in something that cannot be divided or consist of parts. A part of a person is a manifest absurdity. When a man loses his estate, his health, his strength,...same person, and has lost nothing of his personality. If he has a leg or an arm cut of, he is the same person he was before. The amputated member is no part... | |
 | Hubbard Winslow - Philosophy - 1856 - 440 pages
...in something that cannot be divided or consist of parts. A part of a person is a manifest absurdity. When a man loses his estate, his health, his strength,...same person, and has lost nothing of his personality. If he has a leg or an arm cut of, he is the same person he was before. The amputated member is no part... | |
| |
If he has a leg or an arm cut off, he is the same person he was before. The amputated member is no part of his person, otherwise it would have a right to a part of his estate, and be liable for a part of his engagements: it would be entitled to a share... 
