From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 88
Page 39
... automo- bile at an intersection . Acosta v . Smith , App.1945 , 23 So.2d 742 . Any contributory negligence of driver of plaintiff's automobile with which de- fendant's truck collided when automo- bile came to stop could not be imputed ...
... automo- bile at an intersection . Acosta v . Smith , App.1945 , 23 So.2d 742 . Any contributory negligence of driver of plaintiff's automobile with which de- fendant's truck collided when automo- bile came to stop could not be imputed ...
Page 257
... automo- bile using the highway . Pinchera v . Employers Cas . Co. , App.1954 , 73 So.2d 623 . Where a line of vehicles is proceeding along the highway , it is the duty of each driver to so regulate the speed of his own automobile and ...
... automo- bile using the highway . Pinchera v . Employers Cas . Co. , App.1954 , 73 So.2d 623 . Where a line of vehicles is proceeding along the highway , it is the duty of each driver to so regulate the speed of his own automobile and ...
Page 278
... automo- bile approaching from motorist's left , motorist should have seen such automo- bile and known that he could not com- plete his turn in time to avoid being struck by it , and therefore such fault of motorist contributed to the ...
... automo- bile approaching from motorist's left , motorist should have seen such automo- bile and known that he could not com- plete his turn in time to avoid being struck by it , and therefore such fault of motorist contributed to the ...
Contents
Numerical Index to Titles and Chapters | 57 |
Chapter | 80 |
Distribution and Sale of Motor Vehicles | 437 |
Copyright | |
13 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident action Acts ahead apply approaching attempting attempting to pass authority auto automo automobile avoid bile collision contributory negligence crossing damages danger defendant defendant's Department direction distance duty emergency entered intersection evidence evidence established excessive speed exercise fact failing failure fault favored feet finding front give ground guest held highway injuries injuries sustained inter keep La.App lane last clear chance left turn liable lights look Louisiana miles per hour mobile motor vehicle motorist Note observe occurred oncoming operation overtaking owner parked pass passenger person plaintiff plaintiff's automobile police preceding proceeding proper lookout provisions proximate cause rear reasonable recovery regulations resulting road roadway rule safe safety seen showed side signal slow sole speed speed limit stop street sufficient taxicab tion tomobile traffic traveling truck driver violation warning writ denied wrong yield