 Newspaper publications by a lawyer as to pending or anticipated litigation may interfere with a fair trial in the Courts and otherwise prejudice the due administration of justice. Generally they are to be condemned. If the extreme circumstances of a particular...  Reports ... Proceedings - Page 30by Ohio State Bar Association - 1909Full view - About this book
 | Law - 1908 - 398 pages
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | American Bar Association - Bar associations - 1912 - 1266 pages
...avoid testifying in Court in behalf of his client. 20. Newspaper Discussion of Pending Litigation. — Newspaper publications by a lawyer as to pending or...it is unprofessional to make it anonymously. An ex partc reference to the facts should not go beyond quotation from the records and papers on file in... | |
 | American Bar Association - Bar associations - 1915 - 990 pages
...trial in the Courts and otherwise prejudice the due administration of justice. Generally they are to he condemned. If the extreme circumstances of a particular case justify a statement to the puhlie, it is unprofessional to make it annonymously. An ex parte reference to the facts should not... | |
 | American Bar Association - Bar associations - 1921 - 1066 pages
...hehalf of his client. 20. Newspaper Discussion of Pending Litigation. — Newspaper puhlications hy a lawyer as to pending or anticipated litigation may interfere with a fair trial 1n the Courts and otherwise prejudice the due administration of justice. Generally they are to he condemned.... | |
 | Law - 1908 - 1082 pages
...or anticipated litigation, call forth discussion and reply from the opposite party, tend to prevent a fair trial in the Courts, and otherwise prejudice the due administration of justice. It requires a strong case to justify such publications; and when proper, it is unprofessional to make... | |
 | Maryland State Bar Association - 1902 - 184 pages
...or anticipated litigation, call forth discussion and reply from the opposite party, tend to prevent a fair trial in the courts, and otherwise prejudice the due administration of justice. It requires a strong case to justify such publications; and when proper, it is unprofessional to make... | |
| |
