« PreviousContinue »
\ effence of all created things, and therefore cannot “ be prevented by any means whatever, unless by not & creating them at all."
These instances are used instead of Pope's Oak and Weeds, or Jupiter and his Satellites ; but neither Pope, nor this writer, have much contributed to solve the difficulty. Perfection or imperfection of unconscious beings has no meaning as referred to themselves; the bass and the treble are equally perfect ; the mean and magnificent apartments feel no pleasure or pain from the comparison. Pope might ask the weed, why it was less than the oak, but the weed would never ask the question for itself. The bafs and treble differ only to the hearer, meanness and magnificence only to the inhabitant. There is no Evil but must inhere in a conseious being, or be referred to it; that is, Evil must be felt before it is Evil. Yet even on this subject many questions might be offered which human understanding has not yet answered, and which the prefent hafte of this extract will not fuffer me to dilate.
He proceeds to a humble detail of Pope's opinion: * The universe is a system whose very effence consists « in subordination; a scale of beings descending by “ infensible degrees from infinite perfection to abso“ lute nothing; in which, though we may justly « expect to find perfection in the whole, could we “ possibly comprehend it; yet would it be the higheft « absurdity to hope for it in all its parts, because the sbeauty and happiness of the whole depend altoge" ther on the just inferiority of its parts, that is, on “ the comparative imperfections of the several beings “ of which it is composed.”
« It would have been no inore an instance of God's “ wisdom to have created no beings but of the highest « and most perfect order, than it would be of a “ painter's art to cover his whole piece with one “ single colour, the most beautiful he could compose. “ Had he confined himself to such, nothing could “ have existed but demi-gods, or arch-angels, and 66 then all inferior orders must have been void and « uninhabited : but as it is surely more agreeable to “ infinite Benevolence, that all these should be filled up
with beings capable of enjoying happiness themselves, and contributing to that of others, they must “ necessarily be filled with inferior beings, that is, “ with such as are less perfect, but from whose “ existence, notwithstanding that less perfection,
more felicity upon the whole accrues to the uni. “ verse, than if no such had been created. It is “ moreover highly probable, that there is such a o connection between all ranks and orders by subor“ dinate degrees, that they mutually support each “ other's existence, and every one in its place is ab
solutely necessary towards sustaining the whole vast " and magnificent fabrick.
“ Our pretences for complaint could be of this “ only, that we are not so high in the scale of ex“ istence as our ignorant ambition may desire; a
pretence which must eternally subsist ; because,
were we ever so much higher, there would be still “ room for infinite power to exalt us; and since no “ link in the chain can be broke, the same reason “ for disquiet must remain to those who succeed to " that chasm, which must be occasioned by our pre
« ferment. A man can have no reason to repine that “ he is not an angel; nor a horse that he is not a
man; much less, that in their several stations they
poffess not the faculties of another; for this would 6 be an insufferable misfortune.”
This doctrine of the regular subordination of beings, the scale of existence, and the chain of nature, I have often considered, but always left the enquiry in doubt and uncertainty.
That every being not infinite, compared with infinity, must be imperfect, is evident to intuition ; that whatever is imperfect must have a certain line which it cannot pass, is equally certain. But the reason which determined this limit, and for which such being was suffered to advance thus far and no farther, we shall never be able to discern. Our discoverers tell us, the Creator has made beings of all orders, and that therefore one of them nuft be such as man. But this system seems to be established on a concession, which, if it be refused, cannot be extorted.
Every reason which can be brought to prove, that there are beings of every possible fort, will prove
that there is the greatest number possible of every sort of beings; but this with respect to man we know, if we know any thing, not to be true,
It does not appear even to the imagination, that of three orders of being, the first and the third receive any advantage from the imperfection of the second, or that indeed they may not equally exist, though the second had never been, or should cease to be, and why should that be concluded necessary, which cannot Þe proved even to be useful?
The scale of existence from infinity to nothing, cannot possibly have being. The highest being not infinite must be, as has been often observed, at an infinite distance below infinity. Cheyne, who, with the defire inherent in mathetnaticians to reduce every thing to mathematical images, considers all existence as a cone, allows that the basis is at an infinite distance from the body. And in this distance between finite and infinite, there will be room for ever for an infinite series of indefinable existence.
Between the lowest positive existence and nothing, wherever we suppose positive existence to cease, is another chasm infinitely deep; where there is room again for endless orders of fubordinate nature, continued for ever and for ever, and yet infinitely superior to non-existence.
To these meditations humanity is unequal. But yet we may ask, not of our Maket, but of each other, fince on the one fide creation, wherever it stops, muft ftop infinitely below infinity, and on the other infinitely above nothing, what ficceffity there is that it should proceed to far either way that beings fo high or fo low should ever have existed? We may ask ; but I believe no Created wifdom can give an adequate answer.
Nor is this all. In the scale, wherever it begins or ends, are infinite Vacuities. At whatever distance we suppose the next order of beings to be above inan, there is room for an intermediate order of beings between them; and if for one order, then for infinite orders ; since every thing that admits of more or less, and consequently all the parts of that which admits them, may be infinitely divided. So 8
that, as far as we can judge, there may be room in the vacuity between any two steps of the scale, or between any two points of the cone of being, for infinite exertion of infinite power.
Thus it appears how little reason those who repose their reason upon the scale of being have to triumph over them who recur to any other expedient of folution, and what difficulties arise on every side to repress the rebellions of presumptuous decision. Qui pauca confiderat, facile pronunciat. In our paffage through the boundless ocean of disquisition we often take fogs for land, and after having long toiled to approach them, find, instead of repose and harbours, new storms of objection, and fluctuations of uncertainty.
We are next entertained with Pope's alleviations of thofe evils which we are doomed to suffer.
“ Poverty, or the want of riches, is generally comøs pensated by having more hopes, and fewer fears, so by a greater share of health, and a more exqui$ fite relish of the smallest enjoyments, than those “ who possess them are usually blessed with. The $ want of taste and genius, with all the pleasures that « arise from them, are commonly recompensed by a * more useful kind of coinmon sense, together with a
wonderful delight, as well as success, in the busy si pursuits of a scrambling world. The sufferings of “ the fick are greatly relieved by many trifling gras* tifications imperceptible to others, and fometimes as almost repaid by the inconceivable transports occa* fioned by the return of health and vigour. Folly * cannot be very grievous, because imperceptible;
and I doubt not but there is some truth in that rant