Archaeological Review from Cambridge, Volume 5Department of Archaeology, 1986 - Archaeology |
From inside the book
Results 1-1 of 1
Page 207
... striking about the social sciences and archaeology is the contrast in their manner of development . Put rather simplis- tically , archaeology has developed through an interrogation of material facts and the construction of explanations ...
... striking about the social sciences and archaeology is the contrast in their manner of development . Put rather simplis- tically , archaeology has developed through an interrogation of material facts and the construction of explanations ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd millennium BC action analysis anthropology archaeo archaeological heritage Archaeological Review argued artefacts aspects assumptions Azande behaviour Brahmins British Bronze Age building burial cairn Cambridge University Press causewayed enclosures conception construction context created demarcation depth discipline discussion distinction distribution domestic dominant caste Easter Island eavesdrip economic enclosure ethnoarchaeology evidence example excavation exhibition fact Figure formal Giddens Glyn Daniel Hodder Hoskins household houses human important interaction interest interpretation Intrasite Iron Age landscape layout logy London material culture Megalithic tombs megaliths methodological monuments MRA values Neolithic Nick Higham nodes organisation paper past permeability maps plans political prehistory problems Randsborg Rebuilding reference relations relative asymmetry Renfrew Review from Cambridge ritual Robin Boast Savory segregation significance simulated social sciences society Somerset Levels space Spatial Archaeology spatial studies specific status suggest Sweet Track Tilley tradition transformation variability vernacular architecture village women