California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 14California Trial Lawyers Association., 1975 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 5
Page 77
... applicant's em- ployment and the fact that he was going to or coming from work at an irregular time at an irregular place was also sufficient to take the injury out of the ambit of the " going and coming " rule . McCarty vs Apartment ...
... applicant's em- ployment and the fact that he was going to or coming from work at an irregular time at an irregular place was also sufficient to take the injury out of the ambit of the " going and coming " rule . McCarty vs Apartment ...
Page 81
... treatment once it has relinquished the same in the absence of the most compelling circumstances such as defective treatment fur- nished by the applicant's chosen physician or perhaps a change CTLJ , Fall , 1975 81 Workers ' Compensation.
... treatment once it has relinquished the same in the absence of the most compelling circumstances such as defective treatment fur- nished by the applicant's chosen physician or perhaps a change CTLJ , Fall , 1975 81 Workers ' Compensation.
Page 91
... applicant is entitled to no greater expense for losing a days work in going to his own doctor for an examination than if he went to the doctor chosen by the compensation carrier . Mead vs Diamond International Corp. , et al . , 39 CCC 1 ...
... applicant is entitled to no greater expense for losing a days work in going to his own doctor for an examination than if he went to the doctor chosen by the compensation carrier . Mead vs Diamond International Corp. , et al . , 39 CCC 1 ...
Contents
Associate Editors | 4 |
Incoming Presidents Message | 13 |
CTLA Convention Luncheon Address | 29 |
Copyright | |
8 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir accident accidental means action Amicus Curiae Angeles applied attorney attorney's awards BAJI Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court California Trial Lawyers CHAPTER claim client Commission recommends Committee comparative negligence Compensation Appeals Board conduct Constitution contributory negligence counsel criminal CTLA damages death decedent decision defect defendant defendant's disability doctrine double indemnity duty Elmer Low employee evidence fact Federal health-care hearsay hospital Insurance Company interview involved issue Journal judge jurors jury Justice legal malpractice legislation litigation material witnesses medical malpractice membership Mendez-Rodriguez neurosis P.O. Box patient personal injury physician plaintiff practice problems products liability protection provides proximate cause question reasonable recovery result ROBERT Rptr rule against hearsay Sacramento safety San Francisco seminars Sixth Amendment special verdict standard Stat statute strict liability Supp supra testimony tion tort Trial Lawyers Association United WCAB Werchick