Report of the First[-thirty-first] Annual Meeting of the Virginia State Bar Association, Volume 60Virginia State Bar Association, 1950 - Bar associations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 28
Page 59
... opinion that close relationship between the State Association and the local associations is of the greatest importance and that the future of the State Asso- ciation depends largely upon the welfare of the local associa- tions . But ...
... opinion that close relationship between the State Association and the local associations is of the greatest importance and that the future of the State Asso- ciation depends largely upon the welfare of the local associa- tions . But ...
Page 251
... opinion or value more highly his individual reputation than that of the Court to which he should be loyal . Except in case of conscientious difference of opinion on fundamental principle , dissenting opinion should be discouraged in ...
... opinion or value more highly his individual reputation than that of the Court to which he should be loyal . Except in case of conscientious difference of opinion on fundamental principle , dissenting opinion should be discouraged in ...
Page 252
... opinion of every judge . It should take the capricious element out of law and give stability to society — a strong tie of the future to the past . It is true that dead judges may have been unaware of the problems of the age in which the ...
... opinion of every judge . It should take the capricious element out of law and give stability to society — a strong tie of the future to the past . It is true that dead judges may have been unaware of the problems of the age in which the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
aggression Alexander Alexandria American Bar Association Annual Meeting Arling Arlington burg Carter Caton Chairman Char Charles Charlottesville China Christiansburg Circuit Bar Association City Clifton Forge conspiracy County Bar Association Court of Appeals crime Danville dissent Easley Edward Executive Committee Fairfax Frank Front Royal George Goolrick Harrisonburg Harry Hudgins infra ington James Japan Japanese Jessup John Jones Joseph Judicial Circuit Bar Judicial Council Justice Law School lawyers lottesville Lynchburg Martin Martinsville ment military mittee mond Newport noke Norfolk Parker Patrick Henry Pearisburg Peyton practice presented the report President Sutton proposed Pulaski Randolph received and filed resolution Respectfully submitted Rich Richard Richmond Rivinus Roanoke Robert Robertson Section Shackelford Smith Special Committee Staunton Stuart Suffolk Supreme Court Tazewell Thomas tion trial Tribunal United Nations University of Virginia Virginia Military Institute Virginia State Bar Walter Warrenton Washington William William H Williamsburg