Report of the First[-thirty-first] Annual Meeting of the Virginia State Bar Association, Volume 60Virginia State Bar Association, 1950 - Bar associations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 13
Page 41
... majority of the members of this Asso- ciation and the necessary funds are available to carry them into effect . It would be my hope that the committee of the State Bar- the Integrated Bar - would suggest to the Council when it meets ...
... majority of the members of this Asso- ciation and the necessary funds are available to carry them into effect . It would be my hope that the committee of the State Bar- the Integrated Bar - would suggest to the Council when it meets ...
Page 64
... majority vote in the Senate . The result was 18 for and 17 against . The point was raised and sustained by the chair that since the bill imposed a $ 5.00 fee on each lawyer it would require for its passage a majority of the entire ...
... majority vote in the Senate . The result was 18 for and 17 against . The point was raised and sustained by the chair that since the bill imposed a $ 5.00 fee on each lawyer it would require for its passage a majority of the entire ...
Page 81
... majority of your present Committee was agreed upon the principle of compulsory retire- ment at some age , it was unable to reach a majority agreement as to any specific age . Hence no action was taken . Respectfully submitted , THOMAS H ...
... majority of your present Committee was agreed upon the principle of compulsory retire- ment at some age , it was unable to reach a majority agreement as to any specific age . Hence no action was taken . Respectfully submitted , THOMAS H ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
aggression Alexander Alexandria American Bar Association Annual Meeting Arling Arlington burg Carter Caton Chairman Char Charles Charlottesville China Christiansburg Circuit Bar Association City Clifton Forge conspiracy County Bar Association Court of Appeals crime Danville dissent Easley Edward Executive Committee Fairfax Frank Front Royal George Goolrick Harrisonburg Harry Hudgins infra ington James Japan Japanese Jessup John Jones Joseph Judicial Circuit Bar Judicial Council Justice Law School lawyers lottesville Lynchburg Martin Martinsville ment military mittee mond Newport noke Norfolk Parker Patrick Henry Pearisburg Peyton practice presented the report President Sutton proposed Pulaski Randolph received and filed resolution Respectfully submitted Rich Richard Richmond Rivinus Roanoke Robert Robertson Section Shackelford Smith Special Committee Staunton Stuart Suffolk Supreme Court Tazewell Thomas tion trial Tribunal United Nations University of Virginia Virginia Military Institute Virginia State Bar Walter Warrenton Washington William William H Williamsburg