John Locke's Politics of Moral Consensus
The aim of this book is twofold: to explain the reconciliation of religion and politics in the work of John Locke, and to explore the relevance of that reconciliation for politics in our own time. Confronted with deep social divisions over ultimate beliefs, Locke sought to unite society in a single liberal community. Reason could identify divine moral laws that would be acceptable to members of all cultural groups, thereby justifying the authority of government. Greg Forster demonstrates that Locke's theory is liberal and rational but also moral and religious, providing an alternative to the two extremes of religious fanaticism and moral relativism. This account of Locke's thought will appeal to specialists and advanced students across philosophy, political science and religious studies.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accept actions actually appeal argues argument Ashcraft authority basis beliefs Bible build Cambridge cause chapter Christian civil claim clear concern consent cultural dangerous demonstration distinction divine doctrine Dunn epistemological equality Essay essences evidence example existence fact faith follow foundation give given God's God's law grant grounds groups human human nature ideas important individual interpretation Jesus John Locke justify knowledge less liberal limits live Locke Locke's matter meaning method mind miracles moral consensus moral law natural law necessary observation opinions particular person philosophy political community political theory position possible preservation principles problem punishments question rational reading reason religion religious requires revelation rules salvation scripture Second seek simply social society soul specific teachings theology things thought toleration tradition Treatises true truth understanding University University Press writes