Page images
PDF
EPUB

"God, who hath hitherto provided for me in such a manner as best befitted my témporal and spiritual condition, will, I know, continue his provident care of me, while I can have grace to be thankful, and retain the resolution to do my lawful endeavour."

As to the execution of this work, "I have," says the Poet, "as well in that which is of my own invention, as in the Translations, used that simplicity of speech, which being commendable in other things, would have obscured the majesty of those inventions."-"If those indifferent men, who know the poesy and power of the English ongue, may be my judges, they will censure my expressions to be such, as shall neither be obscure to the meanest capacities, nor contemptible to the best judgments, but, observing a middle way, best becoming that purpose for which they were intended."

In recurring to his motives, he says, "if I have laboured in making use with modesty of those gifts which were bestowed on me to that purpose, what blame-worthy have I done?" "If I could have believed that for me to enter into Orders would have made me either the profitable instrument of God's glory, or caused my labours to have been the more holy, or the more edifying, what had letted me to procure that advantage?" &c. "But my mind persuades me that God hath appointed me to serve him in some other course. There are divers gifts, and diversities of callings." "Let all my writings, privately or publicly dispersed, from the first Epigram that ever I composed, until the publishing of these Hymns now traduced by my adversaries; and if there can be found one line savouring of such a mind as may give cause to suspect I undertook that task without that true Christian aim, which I ought to have had; or if the performance itself shall make it appear that I proceeded without that due preparation; or if you can have any probable testimony, that through the course of my life, or by any one scandalous act, I have given that cause of offence, as may disparage my studies, or trouble their devotions to whose use my Hymns are tendered, let these things be laid to my charge, until I find means to disprove and wash away imputations."

"The principal reward which I seek is that which every eye seeth' not; and that, which judge my affections by their own, think me to have least thought on. As for that outward benefit, which the necessities of this life, and my frailties, urge me somewhat to look after, it is that little profit only, which my work naturally brings with itself: nor shall I be long discontented, if that also be taken from me."- "Let them allot me what they please; and balance my talent as they list: God will provide sufficient for me, to whose pleasure I refer the success."

"When those friends, who are engaged for me, are satisfied, to which purpose there is yet, I praise God, sufficient set apart; I vow, in the faith of an honest man, that there will not be left me in all the world, to defend me against my adversaries, and supply the common necessities of nature, so much as will feed me for one week, unless I labour for it: which my enemies are partly informed of, and do thereupon triumph. But not to my discontentment; for I do comfort myself to think how sweet it will be to sit hereafter at some honest labour, and sing these Hymns and Songs to the praise of God, for which the world hath taken from me her favours. Nor doth it trouble me to publish thus much of my poverty, though I know it will sound disgracefully in the ears of most men. mean to procure no man to hazard his estate for me, by pretending better possibilities to secure him than I have, as others usually do: nor value I the reputation which comes by wealth, or such like things, as may be lost through the malice of others, because I know I shall be the better esteemed of for those toys by none but fools, or such idiots as will sooner blush to be found poor than dishonest. Yea, I am assured that among good and wise men, it will be no more shame unto me to be made poor by such means as I have been, than it is to be made sick by the hand of God: nor can I think it will be more my disgrace to have wasted my estate through my studies, than it is to some other students to have thereby im paired their healths."

For I

The selection here compressed together from the copious extracts which form the Editor's Preface, will

prove the youthful mind of Wither to have been exalted by no ordinary feelings. There is a purity and flow in the language of his prose, which could only spring from the heart. Let the Reader compare it with the fashionable style of the day in which it was written; and remark how little it partakes of the general quaintness and pedantry of the age! Wither's merit is facility: his fault, excessive want of compression. His copious ness too often makes him tedious; and sometimes disgusting. These deformities are more abhorrent to such as have been taught mechanically the arts of composition, than to those who prefer thought to diction. There is more depth, originality, and ingenious labour in DONNE; but more nature and interest in WITHER. Many of Wither's Shepherd's Huntpassages ing *, and Fair Virtue +, rise to the tones of enchanting poetry: less vigorous, and less picturesque than the early poems of Milton; but not less pure and far excelling almost all contemporary authors in the lighter sort of lyrick.

The Hymns and Songs were a more perilous task. Johnson has fully explained the difficulty of attempting Sacred Poetry. But Wither's performance in this way is of singular curiosity, for the illustration of the progress of our poetry as well as of our language. I will give a specimen of the Songs, accompanied by the prose introduction.

"THE SEVENTH CANTICLE. "Here is allegorically expressed the majesty, power, and excellency of Christ; and is the effect of that which was evangelically sung of him after his Resurrection and Ascension. First, the Bride is introduced, adjuring the faithful Israelites, that when they have attained the knowledge of Christ her spouse, they should profess and teach him to the rest of their members. Secondly, those who long to find him, desire again of the Church to know the excellencies of

that beloved of hers; and, by doubling the question, seem to imply a two-fold excellency. Thirdly, the Church speedily answers those that inquire after her Spouse; and, by describing his excel

lency in his ten principal members, mystically notifieth his tenfold spiritual perfection, whereupon to insist were not here convenient. Lastly, the faithful crave the Church's direction to help them to find him out; and receive her gracious answer to that purpose.

"SONG XV.

Oh! if him you happen on,
Who is my beloved one,

Daughters of Jerusalem,
1 adjure you seriously
To inform him, how that I

Sick am grown of love for him!
Fairest of all women, tell
How thy lover doth excell

More than other lovers do:
Thy beloved, which is he‡,
That thou dost adjure us so?
He, in whom I so delight,
Is the purest red and white;

Of ten thousand chief is he :

Like fine gold his head doth show, Whereon curled locks do grow,

And a raven-black they be. Like the milky doves that bide By the rivers, he is eyed; Cheeks like spicy beds hath he;

Full and fitly set they are.

Or like flowers that fairest be:

Lips like lilies dropping myrrh. Hands like rings of gold, beset

With the precious chrysolet;

Bellied like white ivory, Wrought about with sapphires rich; Legs, like marble pillars, which

Set on golden bases be. Faced like Libanus is he, Goodly as the cedar-tree,

Sweetness breathing out of him: He is lovely every where. This, my friends, is this my dear, Daughters of Jerusalem. Oh! thou fairest, every way, Of all women! whither may

Thy beloved turned be? Tell us whither he is gone! Who is thy beloved one;

That we seek him may with thee? To the beds of spices there; To his garden went my dear;

I

Where he feeds, and lilies gets : Mine is my beloved one, my love's am, and alone

Who among the lilies eats.

In the present age, in which the sacred writings are studied with so

* Reprinted 1814, by Sir Egerton Brydges, in 12mo, for Longman and Co. (100 copies only).

[ocr errors]

Nearly ready for publication in the same form. Fidelia, another poem of Wither's, has been also reprinted. A line seems omitted in this stanza. much

[ocr errors]

much enthusiasm, the revival of a volume so interesting and instructive in its matter, as well as curious to critical Antiquaries and Philologers, will scarcely be deemed an ungrateful labour. To modern readers the ugly type and dingy paper of too many old books adds to the repulsiveness of the style and versification: and an old composition appears comparatively attractive, when decorated by the improved press of the present day. This new Edition of The Hymns forms an elegant little volume.

URBAN,

Mr.
T Mr. Malone, in

Old Town, Stratford-
upon-Avon.

[ocr errors]

our venerable and highly-valuable Register from May 5th to June 26th, 1788; and consequently had sufficient time for the most careful examination.

According to Mr. Gibbon, in his "Introductio ad Latinam Blazoniam," Church Registers were kept no earlier than the 30th Henry VIII. 1540. Jacob, however, in his Law Dictionary, says, that the "Registrum Ecclesia parochialis" was instituted by Lord Cromwell 13 H. VIII. [1523], while he was Vicar General to that King. The Parish Register of Stratfordupon-Avon commences 25th March, 1558, and to the year 1600 appears to have been kept by or under the direc tion of Mr. Richard Bifield, Minister as he describes himself, but for seve

It was observed by acts of the Shak- ral years vicar of this place. The

speare Family from the Registers of Stratford-upon-Avon (edit. 1790), that "an inaccurate and very imperfect list of the Baptisms, &c. of Shak speare's Family was transmitted by Mr. West, about eighteen years ago, to Mr. Steevens. The list now printed (continues Mr. Malone) I have extracted with great care from the Registers of Stratford; and I trust it will be found correct." Mr. Malone, however, for whatever reason, made numerous errors in his list, besides omitting many very material entries ; he should not, therefore, have complained of that which Mr. Steevens appears to have published, when his own, which he proclaims to have extracted with great care, and trusted would be found correct, is so extremely inaccurate and imperfect. This Commentator, who is, indeed, highly deserving of public thanks for investigating the personal history of our great Dramatic Bard, is less excusable than his predecessor, because it appears that Mr. Steevens obliged to trust to the transcript made by Mr. West, who might not have had leisure, inclination, or patience, to examine a buiky register; for Mr. Malone was in possession of

was

remarkably neat manner in which the
entries were made in his time, was
but ill imitated by succeeding Vicars
in the following century, some of
whom seem to have deputed the most
illiterate scribes to the office of Re-
gistrar. Independently of their great
local use, our Registers are highly
interesting, as containing authentic
memorials of the Shakspeare Family;
but, as such memorials have never
been transcribed so as to preserve the
fidelity of the Register, it may amuse
some of your Readers, and I doubt
not also of its real utility, if you, Mr.
Urban, would dedicate a page or two
of your widely disseminated Magazine
to the preservation of the Shakspeare
Family and connexions, exactly as
they are entered. Those names which
have been hitherto totally omitted, I
have printed in italics, and marked
with an asterisk; but the whole of
the extracts are copied with their ori-
giual abbreviations and corruptions.
Within the brackets are several errors
as well as corrections made by Mr.
Malone, as I find them in Reed's
1813 edition. It should also be no-
ticed that Mr. Malone, as well as his
predecessors, put the whole list into
modern English.

BAPTISMES, Anno Dom. 1558.
Septe❜ber 15.
Jone Shakspere daughter to John Shakspere.
*1562, December 2. Margareta filia Johannis Shakspere.

[ocr errors]

......

1564, April 26..
1566, May 9.
1566, October 13.
1569, April 15.....
1571, Septe'b' 28.

Gulielmus filius Johannes Sbak-pere.

Johanna filia Richardi Hathaway al's Gardner de Shotrey.
Gilbertus filius Johannis Shakspere.

..Jone the daughter of John Shakspère.

Anna filia Magistri Shakspere [Mr. John Shakspere. Malone.] 1573[1573-4],March11.Richard sonne to Mr. John Shakspeer. [Shakspere. Malone.] 1380, May 3. Edmund sonne to Mr. John Shakspere.

[ocr errors]

1583, May 26......... Susanna daughter to William Shakspere.

1583 [1583-4], Feb.10..Elizabeth daughter to Antony Shaksper of Hamton. [of Anthony Shakpere of Hampton. Malone.]

1584 [1584-5], Feb. 2.. Hamnet & Judeth sonne & daughter to Willia' Shakspere. [Judith. Malone.]

1588 [1588-9], Feb.26.. Thomas sonne to Richard Queeny. 1588[1588-9], March 11.Ursula daughter to John Shakspere. 1590, May 24.... Humphrey sonne to John Shakspere. 1591, Septe'ber 21.... Phillippus filius Johannis Shakspere.

........

1593, June 20... Thomas filius Anthonii Nash, Gen'. [Mr. Anthony Nash, 1600, August 28.. Wilhelmus filius Wilhelmi Hart.

1603, June 5...

....

1605, July 24... . . . . . .

Maria filia Willi' Hart.

Thomas fil' Will'mi Hart, Hatter.

1607 [1607-8] Feb. 21.. Elizabeth dawghter to John Hall, Gen'.

1608, Sept. 23... Mychaell sonne to Willyam Hart.

Malone.]

1616, November 23.... Shaksper fillius Thomas Quyny, Gent. [Shakspere. Malone.] 1617 [1617-8], Feb. 9.. Richard fillius Thomas Quinee.

1619[1619-20], Jan. 23.Thomas fili' to Thomas Queeney. [Aug. 29. Malone.] *1633, Sept. 29.......*Michael filius Thomæ Hart.

1634, Aprill 13.

1636, Sept. 18. 1641, June 18..

.....

......

......

Thomas filius Thomæ Hart.
Georgius filius Tho' Hart.
Maria filia Thomæ Hart.

1658 [1658-9], Jan. 9.. Elizabeth fillia Georg Hart,

1661, Decemb' 21.... Jane fillia Georg Hart.

1663[1663-4],March 18.Sushannae filli a George Hartte. [Hart, thus spelt throughout by Malone.]

1666, Novemb' 18..... Shakspere fillius George Hartt. [Shakspeare; from hence. this mode of spelling is invariably continued by Malone.] 1671, March 31....... Mary fillia Georg Hartt, Tayler. [Tayler omitted. Malone.] 1673[1673-4], March 3. Thomas fillius George Hartt.

1676, August 20...... George fillius George Harte.

1695, September 14... William fillius Shakespar Hartt. [William Shakspeare, son of Shakspeare Hart, properly added, but incorrectly spelt by Malone.]

*1698, June 24.......*Thomas filius of George Hart.

......

1700, August 9................. Ann filia of Shaxpear and Ann Hartt. 1700, Novemb' 29..... Jorg filius of Jorg and Marey Hartt. 1702[1702-3], Feb.10.. Hester fillia George Harte.

......

......

1703, July 19...
1705, Octob' 7..
*1711, June 15.............
1729, May 9....
*1731, July 9..
1733, Sep' 29..

[ocr errors]

....

[ocr errors]

Katheren fillia Shakspear and Anne Hartte
Mary fillia Georg Hartte.

*Thomas the sonne of Shakesper Hartt.
.Thomas, son of George Hart jun'r.
*William, son of George Hart jun'r.
Sarah daughter of George Hart.
*1735, Nou'mber 23...* George son of George Hart.
*1737[1737-8], Jan.13.*Mary daughter of George Hart.
1740, Sep'b'r 29.......Ann daughter of George Hart.
*1742[1742-3], Jan.25.* Fillis daughter of George Hart.

1743 [1743-4], Jan. 6.. William Shakespear son of William Shakespear Hart. [Jan 8. *1745, June 19th. *Jemima daughter of George Hart.

....

*1746, May 29th. .... *Catherine daughter of Shakespear Hart.

*1747, Nov. 27th.....*William son of George Hart.

Malone.]

1748, May 10th....... Catherine daughter of Shakespear Hart. [William Shak

speare Hart, corrected by Malone.]

*1753, Oct. 8th......*Sarah daughter of Thomas Hart.

1755, Aug'st 18th.... John son of Thomas Hart.

1760, Aug. 8. ........ Frances daughter of Thomas Hart.

1764, Aug'st 10th... Thomas son of Thomas Hart.

1767, Jan, 16........ Nanny daughter of Thomas Hart. [Anne. Malone.]

Further addition to Mr. Malone's List from the Register which he did not examine:

*1783, April 23.. *Jane daughter of Thomas Hart.

......

"MARIAGES."

1584, November 25... John Shakspere & Margery Roberts.

1607, Junii 5....... John Hall gentlema' & Susanna Shaxspere. [Shakspere. M.] 1615[1615-16], Feabruary 10.. Tho. Queeny tow Judith Shakspere.

1626, Apr' 22........ Mr. Thomas Nash to Mrs. Elizabeth Hall.

Georg Hart, sonn of Thomas Hart, and Ester Ludiate, daughter of Thomas Ludiate, of the same Towne and County, were published of an intent of marriage upon three severall markett dayes in the markett place of Alcester, upon the ith, 8th, & 15th of December, 1657; and, being noe exception against them, were upon the 9th of January, 1657, joyned together in marriage by Francis Smyth, Justice of the Peace in the Burrough of Stratford. Witnes, Thomas Hiccox, Clement George. [1657-8.]

1688, Apar' 16. 1694, Aprell 10.. *1697, Oct. 12.

....

......

Danil Smith to Shussanor Hartt.

.Shaksper Hartt to Ann Pare. [Qu. Parry? Malone says Prew.] *Stephen Spencer of Tardebick to Mary Hart of Stratford.

1728 [1728-9], Feb. 20. George Hart to Sarah Mumford, by Banns.

1563, April 30,

1579, April 4.. 1587, October 29.

"BURIALLS."

Margareta filia Johannis Shakspere.
Anne daughter to Mr. John Shakspere.
Margery wife to John Shakspere.

1589[1589-90],March6.Thomas Green al's Shakspere.

1596, August 11. 1601, Septemb' 8. 1602, May 31........ 1607, Dece'b' 17. 1608, Sept. 9.

.. Hamnet filius William Shakspere. [Shakspeare. Malone.] Mr. Johan'es Shakspeare.

....

....

....

Mr. Richard Quiny Bailey of Stretford.
Mary dawghter to Willyam Hart.

Mayry Shaxspere Wydowe. [Mary Shakspere, widow. M.]

1611 [1611-12], Feb. 3. Gilbertus Shakspeare, adolescens. 16121612-13], Feb. 4. Rich. Shakspeare. [Shakspere. Malone.] 1616, Aprill 17....... Will' Hartt, hatter.

25.......

....

Will' Shakspere, Gent.

1617, Maye 8.... Shakspere fillius Tho. Quyny, Gent. *Micael fil' to Jone Harte, widowe.

1618, November 1.

1622, Novemb' 18....

1623, August 8.

1635, Nov. 26..

Anthonius Nash, Generosus. [Esq. Malone.]

Mrs. Shakspeare. [Shakspere. Malone.]

Johannes Hall, medicus peritissimus. [Dr. John Hall. M.]

1638 [1638-9], Jan. 28. Thomas filius Thomæ Quiney.

1638 [1638-9], Feb. 26. Richardus filius Tho. Quiney.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

Will'mus Hart.

.Joan Hart, widow.

Thomas Nash, Gent. [Esq. Malone.]
Mrs. Susanna Hall, widow.

. Richard Quiney, Gent. of London. [Mr. Richard Queeny. M.]

1661 [1661-2], Febu' 9. Judith uxor Thomas Quiney, Gent.

1682, Novembar 28.

*1691, Decem' 29...

1696, Ap' 29.

1702, May 3....

Margaret Heart, widow.

Thomas sonn of Georg Hartt.

Hester, uxor Georgii Hart.
George Hart.

1705, October 7.. .. Mary uxor George Hartte.

*1710 [1710-11], March 16.* Mary fillia George Hartte.

1738, March 29th.... Anne daughter of Shakespear Hart.

17441744-5], March 8. Shakespear son of Shakespear Hart. [William Shakspeare,

1745, April 28th....
1745, Aug. 29.
1746 [1746-7], March

1747, July 7th.. 1749[1749-50], Feb.28. 1753, July 10th... *1754, Aug. 6th.. 1760, Feb. 5th. 1768, Sep'r 10th.. 1774, Oct'r 31st. 1778, July 8th. *1792, June 21...

*1793, May 28.

*1794, July 30.

son of William Shakspeare Hart, corrected by Malone.] William son of George Hart.

George Hart.

12. Tho. son of Shakespear Hart. [Thomas, son of William Shakspeare Hart, corrected by Malone.]

Shakespear Hart.

Shakespear Hart. [William Shakspeare Hart, corrected by M.]
Widow Hart.

*Sarah wife of George Hart.

Ann Hart. [Daughter of Shakspeare and Anne Hart. M.]
Sally Hart. [Sarah, daughter of George Hart. Malone.]
Francis Hart. [Frances, corrected by Malone.

George Hart.

*Alice Hart.

*Thomas Hart.

*Mary Hart.

The last three names are in that Register which Mr. Malone did not examine.

As a proper accompaniment to the Extracts, I send you a correct Pedigree of the Shakspeare and Hart family.

« PreviousContinue »