The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court DecisionsThis carefully considered book is a welcome addition to the debate over "judicial activism.” Constitutional scholar Kermit Roosevelt III offers an elegantly simple way to resolve the heated discord between conservatives, who argue that the Constitution is immutable, and progressives, who insist that it is a living document that must be reinterpreted in new cultural contexts so that its meaning evolves. Roosevelt uses plain language and compelling examples to explain how the Constitution can be both a constant and an organic document. Recent years have witnessed an increasing drumbeat of complaints about judicial behavior, focusing particularly on Supreme Court decisions that critics charge are reflections of the Justices’ political preferences rather than enforcement of the Constitution. The author takes a balanced look at these controversial decisions through a compelling new lens of constitutional interpretation. He clarifies the task of the Supreme Court in constitutional cases, then sets out a model to describe how the Court creates doctrine to implement the meaning of the Constitution. Finally, Roosevelt uses this model to show which decisions can be justified as legitimate and which cannot. |
Contents
What Doctrine Is For | 22 |
Kelo v City of New London | 133 |
EIGHT The Establishment Clause | 140 |
Roper and Atkins | 151 |
Part IVIllegitimacy | 167 |
Whom | 229 |
Other editions - View all
The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions Kermit Roosevelt Limited preview - 2008 |
The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions Kermit Roosevelt, III No preview available - 2008 |
Common terms and phrases
abortion activist affirmative action allow American anti-deferential applications appropriate argued argument asserted Black Brown burdens Bush Casey chapter citizens claim commerce Congress consensus considered Consti constitutional meaning costs and benefits critics decide deference deferential detainees discrimination discuss dissenting doctrinal rule doctrinal test doctrine and meaning Dred Scott Due Process Clause Eighth Amendment enforcement Equal Protection Clause Establishment Clause Executive fact factors federal government Florida Florida Supreme Court Fourteenth Amendment gay marriage gays and lesbians Gore Hamdi homosexual Ibid illegitimate interest issue judges judgment judicial activism Justice justified Kelo Korematsu Lawrence legislation legislature legitimacy legitimate liberty Lochner Mark Levin Men in Black ment Miranda opinion originalists plain meaning Plessy political prohibits provision punishment question racial minorities Rasul ratifiers reason religious Romer Scalia segregation speech standard stitution strict scrutiny substantial suggest tion tution understanding University Press uphold violated vote women