From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 14
Page 22
22 species B weed seed 4 . 55 1 . 80 0 . 32 categories 0 . 049 83 . 8 Table 1 .
Discrimination of crop processing groups the basis of weed seeds alone .
However , the explanatory power of a solution depends on the interpretability of
the ...
22 species B weed seed 4 . 55 1 . 80 0 . 32 categories 0 . 049 83 . 8 Table 1 .
Discrimination of crop processing groups the basis of weed seeds alone .
However , the explanatory power of a solution depends on the interpretability of
the ...
Page 23
Weed seeds were therefore grouped into categories such as big , heavy and
headed ( BHH ) ; small , free and light ( SFL ) and so on , so as to take account of
these three characteristics simultaneously . The square roots of percentages of ...
Weed seeds were therefore grouped into categories such as big , heavy and
headed ( BHH ) ; small , free and light ( SFL ) and so on , so as to take account of
these three characteristics simultaneously . The square roots of percentages of ...
Page 24
75 underlined Table 2 : Loadings on discriminant functions using weed seed
categories . The results of the discriminant analysis are consistent with these
expectations ( see Table 2 ; Figure 4 ) . Big , free , heavy seeds load high
negatively on ...
75 underlined Table 2 : Loadings on discriminant functions using weed seed
categories . The results of the discriminant analysis are consistent with these
expectations ( see Table 2 ; Figure 4 ) . Big , free , heavy seeds load high
negatively on ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Academic activity analogies analysis Anthropology approach archaeological associated attempt behaviour Binford bone by-products Cambridge camps campsites changes classes communities complex context contribution crop cultural dependent discussion distance distribution domestic early economic edited Ethnoarchaeology ethnographic evidence example excavation fact field Figure function gathering groups hearth Hodder household hunter-gatherer hunting important included increasing indicated individuals interest interpretation issue Kung living London manufacture material mean Monuments nature nomad object observations occur organisation particular past patterns population possible pottery present Press problem processing production questions range record References relationship relevant remains result Review samples season camps seeds settlement sieve situation social society space spatial specific stages stone storage stratification structure suggest tent Theft Act 1968 theory tion units University variables village weed Yellen York
Bibliographic information
| Title | Archaeological review from Cambridge, Volume 2, Issue 2 Archaeological review from Cambridge |
| Published | 1983 |
| Original from | the University of California |
| Digitized | 12 Apr 2011 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |