Archaeological Review from Cambridge, Volume 2Department of Archaeology, 1983 - Archaeology |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 12
Page 82
control over it , or any proprietary right or interest in it . Thus , an object buried under someone's land is that person's property . If property has been abandoned there can be no theft . Whether property has been abandoned is a ...
control over it , or any proprietary right or interest in it . Thus , an object buried under someone's land is that person's property . If property has been abandoned there can be no theft . Whether property has been abandoned is a ...
Page 90
Social classes as they were originally defined in the sociological sciences are mere statistical collections embodying diverse groups with different interests . The utility of the concept of social class is currently being challenged ...
Social classes as they were originally defined in the sociological sciences are mere statistical collections embodying diverse groups with different interests . The utility of the concept of social class is currently being challenged ...
Page 93
Archaeologists can channel this interest by writing not just for their academic peers , but also for someone with only a passing interest in archaeology ; by using amateurs in availability -- nature and makes them very important —— of ...
Archaeologists can channel this interest by writing not just for their academic peers , but also for someone with only a passing interest in archaeology ; by using amateurs in availability -- nature and makes them very important —— of ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Academic activity analogies analysis Anthropology approach archaeological associated attempt behaviour Binford bone by-products Cambridge camps campsites changes classes communities complex context contribution cultural dependent discussion distance distribution domestic early economic edited Ethnoarchaeology ethnographic evidence example excavation fact field Figure function gathering groups hearth Hodder household hunter-gatherer hunting important included increasing individuals interest interpretation issue Kung living London major manufacture material mean Monuments nature nomad observations occur organisation particular past patterns population possible pottery present Press problem processing production questions range record References relationship relevant remains result Review Roman samples season camps seeds settlement sieve similar situation social society space spatial specific stages stone storage stratification structure suggest tent Theft Act 1968 theory tion units University variables village weed York Zardeh