From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 20
Page 50
The remaining variability is ascribable to the effect of the variation in spacing
between the individual households . If variability in household spacing is not
random , it should relate to patterning in the arrangement of huts within a camp .
The remaining variability is ascribable to the effect of the variation in spacing
between the individual households . If variability in household spacing is not
random , it should relate to patterning in the arrangement of huts within a camp .
Page 57
For instance , among the Alyawara , O ' Connell notes ( 1979 : 107 ) : Household
camps are neither randomly nor regularly distributed through the settlement , but
are grouped in discrete clusters , consisting of 2 - 12 households . . . Members ...
For instance , among the Alyawara , O ' Connell notes ( 1979 : 107 ) : Household
camps are neither randomly nor regularly distributed through the settlement , but
are grouped in discrete clusters , consisting of 2 - 12 households . . . Members ...
Page 58
... particularly the increasing distance between huts , the construction of fences
around some households , and indeed the ... the individual household serves as
a means of buffering against variation in subsistence intake at the household
level ...
... particularly the increasing distance between huts , the construction of fences
around some households , and indeed the ... the individual household serves as
a means of buffering against variation in subsistence intake at the household
level ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Academic activity analogies analysis Anthropology approach archaeological associated attempt behaviour Binford bone by-products Cambridge camps campsites changes classes communities complex context contribution crop cultural dependent discussion distance distribution domestic early economic edited Ethnoarchaeology ethnographic evidence example excavation fact field Figure function gathering groups hearth Hodder household hunter-gatherer hunting important included increasing indicated individuals interest interpretation issue Kung living London manufacture material mean Monuments nature nomad object observations occur organisation particular past patterns population possible pottery present Press problem processing production questions range record References relationship relevant remains result Review samples season camps seeds settlement sieve situation social society space spatial specific stages stone storage stratification structure suggest tent Theft Act 1968 theory tion units University variables village weed Yellen York