From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 15
Page 17
Efremov 1940 and figure 1 ) role of crop processing studies was stressed by
Dennell ( 1972 ) who noted that the effect of crop processing activities , and
therefore of archaeological context , on the composition of archaeobotanical
samples ...
Efremov 1940 and figure 1 ) role of crop processing studies was stressed by
Dennell ( 1972 ) who noted that the effect of crop processing activities , and
therefore of archaeological context , on the composition of archaeobotanical
samples ...
Page 20
Though the details may vary and , in particular , the implements used , the
processing stages remain essentially the same and so , more importantly , do
their effects on composition . Thus , the effect of winnowing is to separate the light
...
Though the details may vary and , in particular , the implements used , the
processing stages remain essentially the same and so , more importantly , do
their effects on composition . Thus , the effect of winnowing is to separate the light
...
Page 25
Moreover , if the main objective of the crop processing study is taphonomic , i . e .
to ensure that the effects of crop ... say , husbandry practices , then it matters little
if different processing techniques have the same effect on sample composition .
Moreover , if the main objective of the crop processing study is taphonomic , i . e .
to ensure that the effects of crop ... say , husbandry practices , then it matters little
if different processing techniques have the same effect on sample composition .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Academic activity analogies analysis Anthropology approach archaeological associated attempt behaviour Binford bone by-products Cambridge camps campsites changes classes communities complex context contribution crop cultural dependent discussion distance distribution domestic early economic edited Ethnoarchaeology ethnographic evidence example excavation fact field Figure function gathering groups hearth Hodder household hunter-gatherer hunting important included increasing indicated individuals interest interpretation issue Kung living London manufacture material mean Monuments nature nomad object observations occur organisation particular past patterns population possible pottery present Press problem processing production questions range record References relationship relevant remains result Review samples season camps seeds settlement sieve situation social society space spatial specific stages stone storage stratification structure suggest tent Theft Act 1968 theory tion units University variables village weed Yellen York
Bibliographic information
| Title | Archaeological review from Cambridge, Volume 2, Issue 2 Archaeological review from Cambridge |
| Published | 1983 |
| Original from | the University of California |
| Digitized | 12 Apr 2011 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |