Reason in Action: Essays in the Philosophy of Social Science
Did Adam and Eve act rationally in eating the fruit of the forbidden tree? That can seem to depend solely on whether they had found the best means to their ends, in the spirit of the "economic" theories of rationality. In these essays, culled in revised form from twenty-five years' work, Martin Hollis argues that social action cannot be understood by viewing human beings as abstract individuals with preferences in search of satisfaction, or by divorcing practical reason from questions of the rationality of norms, principles, practices and ends.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action actors answer argue assumptions authority become beliefs better choose citizen claim concept consequences context culture depends desire distinction doctor doubt duty economic empirical ends ethics example expected explanation expressive fact give given hand Hence hold honour human idea identify identity individuals instance interests interpretation involved irrational judge judgement keep language least live matter means merely mind moral motives move native nature norms notion objection offer patients person Philosophy play players political possible preferences present principle problem question rational agent rational choice rational choice theory reason relations requires ritual beliefs role rules seems sense simply situation social society suggest suppose theory thought translation treat true turn understand universal utility wants