Page images
PDF
EPUB

of feeling, were the sources of a style which enabled him to write more than any other journalist of his time, and yet always command attention. But he is a model which none can successfully imitate without his strongly marked individuality and peculiarities of mental structure. We have mentioned his occasional coarseness; but it was merely his preference of strong direct expression to dainty feebleness; he was never vulgar.

Mr. Greeley has contributed to the surprising growth and development of journalism in our time, chiefly by his successful efforts to make it a guide of public opinion, as well as a chronicle of important news. In his hands, it was not merely a mirror which indifferently reflects back the images. of all objects on which it is turned, but a creative force; a means of calling into existence a public opinion powerful enough to introduce great reforms and sweep down abuses. He had no faith in purposeless journalism, in journalism which has so little insight into the tendencies of the time that it shifts its view from day to day in accommodation to transient popular caprices. No great object is accomplished without constancy of purpose, and a guide of public opinion can not be constant unless he has a deep and abiding conviction of the importance of what he advocates. Mr. Greeley's remarkable power, when traced back to its main source, will be found to have consisted chiefly in that vigorous earnestness of belief which held him to the strenuous advocacy of measures which he thought conducive to the public welfare, whether they were temporarily popular or not. Journalism may perhaps gain more success as a mercantile speculation by other methods; but it can be respected as a great moral and political force only in the hands of men who have the talents, foresight, and moral earnestness which fit them to guide public opinion. It is in this sense that Mr. Greeley

was our first journalist, and nobody can successfully dispute his rank, any more than Mr. Bennett's could be contested in the kind that seeks to float on the current instead of directing its course. The one did most to render our American journals great vehicles of news, the other to make them controlling organs of opinion. Their survivors in the profession have much to learn from both.-New York World. Knight of the ready pen,

Soldier without a sword,

Such eyes hadst thou for other men,
So true and grand a word!

As Cæsar led his legions

Triumphant over Gaul,

And through still wilder, darker regions,

So thou didst lead us all!

Until we saw the chains

Which bound our brothers' lives,
And heard the groans and felt the pains,
Which come from wearing gyves.

To brave heroic men

The false no more was true;
And what the Nation needed then

Could any soldier do.

[graphic][subsumed]

VII.

WENDELL PHILLIPS.

(BORN 1811-Died 1884.)

THE TIMES WHEN HE APPEARED “WHO IS THIS FELLOW ?”—A
FLAMING ADVOCATE OF LIBERTY-LIBERTY OF SPEECH AND
THOUGHT-POWER TO DISCERN THE RIGHT-THE
MOB-BEATEN HERO TRIUMPHANT.

ONG chapters of history are illumined as by an electric light in the following characteristic address from his pulpit by Henry Ward Beecher, at the time the name of the great philanthropist was

added to the roll of American heroes.

THE TIMES WHEN HE APPEARED.

The condition of the public mind throughout the North at the time I came to the consciousness of public affairs and was studying my profession may be described, in one word, as the condition of imprisoned moral sense. All men, almost, agreed with all men that slavery was wrong; but what can we do? The compromises of our fathers include us and bind us to fidelity to the agreements that had been made in the formation of our Constitution. Our confederation first, and our Constitution after. These were regarded everywhere as moral obligations by men that hated slavery. "The compromises of the Constitution must be respected," said the priest in the pulpit, said the politician in the field, said the statesmen in public halls; and men abroad, in England especially, could not understand what was the reason of the hesitancy of President Lincoln and of the people, when they had risen to arms, in declaring at once the end for which arms were taken and armies gathered to be the emancipation of the

« PreviousContinue »