Aviation Safety: Treatment of Families After Airline Accidents : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Aviation of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, Second Session, June 19, 1996
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Subcommittee on Aviation
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997 - Aeronautics - 462 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accident action activities advertising advocate agency Air Disaster airline American assistance Association attorney authority Aviation believe Board cause Chairman charge claims client committee communication concerning conduct contingency fee costs counsel Court crash direct effects efforts established fact family members filed firm Flight Florida Florida Bar funds give Hall hearing House identified individual injury interest involved issues June law firm lawyer legal services limited litigation matter meeting NTSB organization party passengers person plaintiffs plane position practice problem professional prohibited proposal protect question rates reasonable received regarding remains reports represent representation request response result rule Safety Secretary Senate served solicitation statement survivors testimony Thank third tion tort Transportation United ValuJet victims
Page 380 - ... purposes, or to pay or reward, directly or indirectly, those who bring or influence the bringing of such cases to his office, or to remunerate policemen, court or prison officials, physicians, hospital attaches or others who may succeed, under the guise of giving disinterested friendly advice, in influencing the criminal, the sick and the injured, the ignorant or others, to seek his professional services.
Page 273 - In the course of representing a client a lawyer shall not knowingly: (a) make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person; or (b) fail to disclose a material fact to a third person...
Page 275 - ... (2) A lawyer who undertakes to complete unfinished legal business of a deceased lawyer may pay to the estate of the deceased lawyer that proportion of the total compensation which fairly represents the services rendered by the deceased lawyer. (3) A lawyer or law firm may include nonlawyer employees in a retirement plan, even though the plan is based in whole or in part on a profit-sharing arrangement.
Page 269 - ... (2) Knowingly advance a claim or defense that is unwarranted under existing law, except that he may advance such claim or defense if it can be supported by good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law.
Page 252 - A lawyer shall not enter into an agreement for, charge, or collect an illegal or clearly excessive fee. (B) A fee is clearly excessive when, after a review of the facts, a lawyer of ordinary prudence would be left with a definite and firm conviction that the fee is in excess of a reasonable fee.
Page 259 - A lawyer shall not acquire a proprietary interest in the cause of action or subject matter of litigation he is conducting for a client, except that he may: (1) Acquire a lien granted by law to secure his fee or expenses.
Page 252 - Factors to be considered as guides in determining the reasonableness of a fee include the following: 1. The time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly. 2. The likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer. 3. The fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services. 4. The amount involved and the results...
Page 271 - DR 7-106(C)(6) provided that a lawyer shall not engage in "undignified or discourteous conduct which is degrading to a tribunal." RULE 3.6 TRIAL PUBLICITY (a) A lawyer shall not make an extrajudicial statement that a reasonable person would expect to be disseminated by means of public communication if the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that it will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding.