From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 11
Page 61
The Stonehenge barrows ( which had been raped by the score and with uncommon thoroughness by William Cunnington not much more than 60 years previously ) seemed to him a great deal safer in his 5 own hands than in those of the ...
The Stonehenge barrows ( which had been raped by the score and with uncommon thoroughness by William Cunnington not much more than 60 years previously ) seemed to him a great deal safer in his 5 own hands than in those of the ...
Page 62
on as Sir Edmund and Sir John Lubbock were old adversaries from the debate on Lubbock's Ancient Monuments Bill , and Lubbock had been a member of the 1870 British Association committee set up to excavate Stonehenge .
on as Sir Edmund and Sir John Lubbock were old adversaries from the debate on Lubbock's Ancient Monuments Bill , and Lubbock had been a member of the 1870 British Association committee set up to excavate Stonehenge .
Page 65
Pitt - Rivers , report on Stonehenge , 2 October 1893 , in Public Record Office WORK 14 : 213 . 9. ibid . 10. Sir Edmund Antrobus , letter to G. Shaw Lefevre , 12 January 1894 , in Public Record Office WORK 14 : 213 . 11.
Pitt - Rivers , report on Stonehenge , 2 October 1893 , in Public Record Office WORK 14 : 213 . 9. ibid . 10. Sir Edmund Antrobus , letter to G. Shaw Lefevre , 12 January 1894 , in Public Record Office WORK 14 : 213 . 11.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
STATEMENT OF EDITORIAL INTENT | 2 |
David R Crowther | 9 |
Brian Charge The work of a local society and its interaction | 21 |
8 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
acceptable activity allow amateur approach Association attempt audience become believe British Cambridge century chapter CHRONICLE clubs collect concern considered continue critical cultural discussion early effect establishment evidence example excavation existence explained expressed field fieldwork finds followed further give given groups heritage historical idea important individual interest interpretation involved issue knowledge later least less ley hunters lines London look major material means metal detector museums names nature objects organisation original past period Popular Archaeology possible present problem professional programme question reasons recent reconstruction recording References reflect regard relevant replies response result returned Review seen social society sources specific Stonehenge stones suggested survey television theory treasure hunting Units University visitors
Bibliographic information
| Title | Archaeological review from Cambridge, Volume 2, Issue 1 Archaeological review from Cambridge |
| Published | 1983 |
| Original from | the University of California |
| Digitized | 12 Apr 2011 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |