Page images
PDF
EPUB

enemy of idolatry; and whether the church was or was not a very sink of idolatry in his time, I leave you to judge, that is to say, if you will take the trouble to read his history, and compare it, as I have done, with the general history of the world.

“At that era, the pagan religion was in a great measure restored, but in a more irrational form than in its original mythology; for the ancient pagans believed in the existence of intellectual powers, or deities, suitable to the different occasions on which they required celestial aid. In love, they addressed themselves to Cupid and Venus; in their vengeance, to Jove; in their voyages, to Neptune and Æolus; and in their resentments to Mars. But to the huIman deities of the Christian idolaters of Mahomet's time an universal influence was ascribed,-and the saint was preferred according to the fancy of the suppliants. Is it therefore to be wondered, that so shrewd a man as the impostor was, should not have seen that there were many among mankind who despised the idolatry of his time, and were ripened for more rational dogmas? But we have lost sight of the real character with which Mahomet set out in his career, in the warlike principles which he was afterwards, partly from necessity, though generally from ambition, induced to adopt.

"He was in his youth the handsomest man of all the Arabs; he was descended of a sacred race, the guardians of the Caaba, an altar consecrated to the service of God, in the days of antiquity, by Ishmael; -he spoke with singular grace and eloquence, and in his deportment he was distinguished for a wisdom beyond his years;-all those who knew him from his

boyhood had a presentiment that he was destined to greatness; indeed his very name signifies as much, for it means the glorified,' and no other had ever borne it before himself.

"When he was only thirteen years of age, he happened to be in Bosra, and his appearance so struck a monk, that he admonished the person with whom the boy was in company, to take care of him, for that he was assuredly ordained to become an extraordinary person.

"He was a great traveller, and his conversation was remarkable for a wonderful sagacity and knowledge of the mysteries of human nature,-and he often, long before he became a teacher, expressed great contempt for the state of religion throughout the world, declaring that it had no resemblance to the religion inculcated by Adam, by Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and the prophets,—which was all very true; and it was remarked, that in maintaining these opinions, he was never contradicted, either because he made the truth so plain by his eloquence, or because it was felt by others to have been so indisputable. And it cannot be questioned, that the version of Christianity with which he opened his lectures, was far more pure, and according to the Gospel, than any thing then taught in the churches. His subsequent pretences to prophecy, and all the errors that followed in his imposture and apostacy, have thrown a cloud over the greatness, and the wisdom, and the boldness of his first endeavours; but I question very much if he kindled not a light within the body of the church that has never yet been extinguished. Men of his stamp, to be justly

considered, should be viewed in connexion with the moral and political circumstances in which they appear; and perhaps in this respect, notwithstanding your interjection, it might not be difficult to show, that in some things the merits of Mahomet were not inferior to the exertions and intrepidity of Luther." "Well," said the Bachelor," as you are in one of your sensation-producing moods, I shall not contradict you."

66

Nay," exclaimed Egeria, "if you are in that vein, I shall say no more, but read you Mr Roscoe's character of Luther, which I think very ably drawn. It is not embued with much of the energy of genius, but, like all the other productions of that author's pen, it is distinguished for good sense, a certain classical propriety,-in short, it is a tasteful but not an original sketch."

"In order to form a proper estimate of the conduct and character of Luther, it is necessary to consider him in two principal points of view: First, as an opponent to the haughty assumptions and gross abuses of the Roman See; and, secondly, as the founder of a new church, over which he may be said to have presided until the time of his death, in 1546, an interval of nearly thirty years. In the former capacity we find him endeavouring to substitute the authority of reason and of scripture for that of councils and of popes, and contending for the utmost latitude in the perusal and construction of the sacred writings, which, as he expressed it, could not be chained, but were open to the interpretation of every individual. For this great and daring attempt he was peculiarly qualified. A consciousness of his own integrity, and the natural intrepidity of his mind, enabled him not only to brave the most violent attacks of his

adversaries, but to treat them with a degree of derision and contempt, which seemed to prove the superiority of his cause. Fully sensible of the importance and dignity of his undertaking, he looked with equal eyes on all worldly honours and distinctions; and emperors, and pontiffs, and kings, were regarded by him as men and as equals, who might merit his respect or incur his resentment, according as they were inclined to promote or obstruct his views. Nor was he more firm against the stern voice of authority, than against the blandishments of flattery, and the softening influence of real or of pretended friendship. The various attempts which were made to induce him to relax in his opposition seem in general to have confirmed rather than shaken his resolution; and if at any time he shewed a disposition towards conciliatory measures, it was only a symptom that his opposition would be soon carried to a greater extreme. The warmth of his temperament seldom, however, prevented the exercise of his judgment; and the various measures to which he resorted for securing popularity to his cause, were the result of a thorough knowledge of the great principles of human nature, and of the peculiar state of the times in which he lived. The injustice and absurdity of resorting to violence, instead of convincing the understanding by argument, were shewn by him in the strongest light. Before the imperial diet he asserted his own private opinion, founded, as he contended, on reason and scripture, against all the authorities of the Roman church; and the important point which he incessantly laboured to establish was the right of private judgment in matters of faith. To the defence of this proposition he was at all times ready to devote his learning, his talents, his repose, his character, and his life; and the great and imperishable merit of this reformer consists in his having demonstrated it. by such arguments, as neither the efforts of his adversa❤

ries, nor his own subsequent conduct, have been able either to refute or invalidate.

"As the founder of a new church, the character of Luther appears in a very different light. After having effected a separation from the See of Rome, there yet remained the still more difficult task of establishing such a system of religious faith and worship as, without admitting the exploded doctrines of the papal church, would prevent that licentiousness which, it was supposed, would be the consequence of a total absence of all ecclesiastical restraints. In this task Luther engaged, with a resolution equal to that with which he had braved the authority of the Romish church; but with this remarkable difference, that in one instance he effected his purpose by strenuously insisting on the right of private judgment in matters of faith, whilst, in the other, he succeeded, by laying down new doctrines, to which he expected that all those who espoused his cause should implicity submit. The opinions of Luther on certain points were fixed and unalterable. The most important of these were, the doctrine of the real presence in the Eucharist, and the justification of mankind by faith alone. Whoever assented not to these propositions was not of his church; and although he was ready, on all occasions, to make use of arguments from scripture for the defence of his tenets, yet, when these proved insufficient, he seldom hesitated to resort to more violent measures. This was fully exemplified in his conduct towards his friend Carlostadt, who, not being able to distinguish between the Romish doctrine of transubstantiation and that of the real presence of Christ in the sacrament, had, like Zuinglius, adopted the idea that the bread and the wine were only the symbols, and not the actual substance of the body and blood of Christ. Luther, however, maintained his opinion with the utmost obstinacy; the dispute became the subject of several vio

« PreviousContinue »