California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 84
Page 26
... trial by jury . See e.g. Jehl v . Southern Pacific Co. , supra ; Langdon v . Superior Court , supra ( court's attempt to compel jury to change its verdict for damages to a different amount deprived defendants of their jury trial rights ...
... trial by jury . See e.g. Jehl v . Southern Pacific Co. , supra ; Langdon v . Superior Court , supra ( court's attempt to compel jury to change its verdict for damages to a different amount deprived defendants of their jury trial rights ...
Page 37
... trial court confirmed a jury verdict in favor of Lull . On appeal the Supreme court held the unreasonably dangerous require- ment was improper in both design defect and manufacturing defect cases . The court recognized that design ...
... trial court confirmed a jury verdict in favor of Lull . On appeal the Supreme court held the unreasonably dangerous require- ment was improper in both design defect and manufacturing defect cases . The court recognized that design ...
Page 16
... trial court has broad powers , and on its own motion may curb your voir dire examination , a limited inquiry may prove ultimately beneficial in achieving a more adequate award and this should not be curbed by the Court . Although the court ...
... trial court has broad powers , and on its own motion may curb your voir dire examination , a limited inquiry may prove ultimately beneficial in achieving a more adequate award and this should not be curbed by the Court . Although the court ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning