California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 28
Page 46
... tion of the Hazards Analysis technique ( see Table 4 ) . Table 4 HAZARDS ANALYSIS TOASTER OVEN SYSTEM ( S ) HAZARD Pinch Points Door Mechanism Tray & Grill Cleaning Tray ( bottom back ) Control Knob Opening Bar Electrical Plug Hot ...
... tion of the Hazards Analysis technique ( see Table 4 ) . Table 4 HAZARDS ANALYSIS TOASTER OVEN SYSTEM ( S ) HAZARD Pinch Points Door Mechanism Tray & Grill Cleaning Tray ( bottom back ) Control Knob Opening Bar Electrical Plug Hot ...
Page 74
... tion " or " pharmaceutical " and this can effectively be used to your advantage . Similarly , such words as " die " should be utilized where possible instead of " expired . " An obvious example of an action word is " yank " rather than ...
... tion " or " pharmaceutical " and this can effectively be used to your advantage . Similarly , such words as " die " should be utilized where possible instead of " expired . " An obvious example of an action word is " yank " rather than ...
Page 62
... tion Law , Section 48.10 , pages 8-205-8-206 wherein the author stated : “ If this question cannot be answered ' yes ' , the investiga- tion is closed and there is no need to go into the tests of relative control and the like . This ...
... tion Law , Section 48.10 , pages 8-205-8-206 wherein the author stated : “ If this question cannot be answered ' yes ' , the investiga- tion is closed and there is no need to go into the tests of relative control and the like . This ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning