California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 36
Page 72
... testify except for purposes of impeachment . Only the party upon whom a demand for an exchange of expert witnesses has been made or who has made such a demand has standing to object to the appearance of an unlisted or insufficiently ...
... testify except for purposes of impeachment . Only the party upon whom a demand for an exchange of expert witnesses has been made or who has made such a demand has standing to object to the appearance of an unlisted or insufficiently ...
Page 92
... testify again or will be extremely reluctant to testify because they acquire a horror of the rigors of cross- examination , the late night conferences , and the pressure of an adversary system - not to mention being involved in a case ...
... testify again or will be extremely reluctant to testify because they acquire a horror of the rigors of cross- examination , the late night conferences , and the pressure of an adversary system - not to mention being involved in a case ...
Page 34
... testifies . This prevents the testimony of the plaintiff from being impeached by the defendant who has been there ... testify about the patient's conditions , the causes of death , the causes of the condition and its probable future ...
... testifies . This prevents the testimony of the plaintiff from being impeached by the defendant who has been there ... testify about the patient's conditions , the causes of death , the causes of the condition and its probable future ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning