California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 24
Page 121
... supra , p . 227 . The Kriegler court then relied for precedence upon a New Jersey case wherein the purchaser of a ... supra . More recently strict liability has been applied to a defective wall heater resulting in damages to the premises ...
... supra , p . 227 . The Kriegler court then relied for precedence upon a New Jersey case wherein the purchaser of a ... supra . More recently strict liability has been applied to a defective wall heater resulting in damages to the premises ...
Page 13
... supra , Zolkover v . Pacific Electric Railway Company , ( 1927 ) 82 Cal . App . 773 , 254 P. 926 , but see People v . Williams , ( 1981 ) contra , cited supra . The courts are apparently of the opinion that it is not the function of the ...
... supra , Zolkover v . Pacific Electric Railway Company , ( 1927 ) 82 Cal . App . 773 , 254 P. 926 , but see People v . Williams , ( 1981 ) contra , cited supra . The courts are apparently of the opinion that it is not the function of the ...
Page 92
... supra ; and Cate v . Blue Cross , etc. , supra . In Lederman v . Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company , 2 an action against an insurer which had issued a group medical insurance policy to an ERISA employee welfare benefit plan , the ...
... supra ; and Cate v . Blue Cross , etc. , supra . In Lederman v . Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company , 2 an action against an insurer which had issued a group medical insurance policy to an ERISA employee welfare benefit plan , the ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning