California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 12
Page 97
USING RES IPSA EFFECTIVELY By PAUL V. MELODIA , Esq . San Francisco 1. USEFUL APPLICATIONS OF THE DOCTRINE The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur has been relied on by plaintiffs less frequently in recent years for a number of identifiable ...
USING RES IPSA EFFECTIVELY By PAUL V. MELODIA , Esq . San Francisco 1. USEFUL APPLICATIONS OF THE DOCTRINE The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur has been relied on by plaintiffs less frequently in recent years for a number of identifiable ...
Page 98
... res ipsa or come forward with proof that the accident was not due to its negligence . See Preissman v . Ford Motor Co. ( 1969 ) 1 Cal.App.3d 841 , 852-854 for a clear example of such a circumstance and note the trial court's in ...
... res ipsa or come forward with proof that the accident was not due to its negligence . See Preissman v . Ford Motor Co. ( 1969 ) 1 Cal.App.3d 841 , 852-854 for a clear example of such a circumstance and note the trial court's in ...
Page 102
... res ipsa . Any such argument should include an explanation of the probative value of circumstantial evidence and the historical reason for develop- ment of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur . Such standard works as Proser on Torts ...
... res ipsa . Any such argument should include an explanation of the probative value of circumstantial evidence and the historical reason for develop- ment of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur . Such standard works as Proser on Torts ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning