California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 24
Page 16
... protect themselves , economically or otherwise . This feature alone constitutes a sufficient reason to condemn the ... protection clause of our Constitution , Article I , §7 , prohibits the singling out , from the wide range of tort ...
... protect themselves , economically or otherwise . This feature alone constitutes a sufficient reason to condemn the ... protection clause of our Constitution , Article I , §7 , prohibits the singling out , from the wide range of tort ...
Page 19
... protection would be purely illusory for plaintiffs under C.C.P. §667.7 , however , for the purpose of the CIGA is to resolve in lump sum the liabilities of in- solvent insurers and not to remain in business for decades . Moreover its ...
... protection would be purely illusory for plaintiffs under C.C.P. §667.7 , however , for the purpose of the CIGA is to resolve in lump sum the liabilities of in- solvent insurers and not to remain in business for decades . Moreover its ...
Page 34
... protect against unintended but foreseeable risks of injury , fails to perform intended functions , and does nto protect adequately against the danger it was supposed to guard , creates unreasonably dangerous side effects , and fails to ...
... protect against unintended but foreseeable risks of injury , fails to perform intended functions , and does nto protect adequately against the danger it was supposed to guard , creates unreasonably dangerous side effects , and fails to ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning