California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-2 of 2
Page 39
... proposed for the jury's contemplation of the value to be placed upon the general damages . In discussing damages it is essential that each of the elements of the damages recited in the Court's jury instructions on the subject matter be ...
... proposed for the jury's contemplation of the value to be placed upon the general damages . In discussing damages it is essential that each of the elements of the damages recited in the Court's jury instructions on the subject matter be ...
Page 99
... to reject as speculation a proposed explanation for the accident based on an unsubstantiated theory of an expert witness . The court observed that a reasonable mind could accept the explanation only as a possible explanation and not as a ...
... to reject as speculation a proposed explanation for the accident based on an unsubstantiated theory of an expert witness . The court observed that a reasonable mind could accept the explanation only as a possible explanation and not as a ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning