California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 4
Page 65
... privileged under the psychotherapists - patient privilege , Evidence Code , Section 1014 , until the patient " tenders " these issues in your case . Evidence Code , Section 1016 , or until the privilege is waived , Evidence Code ...
... privileged under the psychotherapists - patient privilege , Evidence Code , Section 1014 , until the patient " tenders " these issues in your case . Evidence Code , Section 1016 , or until the privilege is waived , Evidence Code ...
Page 66
... privilege . Marcus v . Superi- or Court , 18 Cal . App . 3d 22 , 95 Cal . Rptr . 545 , ( 1971 ) ; Ascherman v . Superior Court , 254 Cal . App . 2d 506 , 62 Cal . Rptr . 547 , ( 1967 ) ; Costa v . Regents of the University of California ...
... privilege . Marcus v . Superi- or Court , 18 Cal . App . 3d 22 , 95 Cal . Rptr . 545 , ( 1971 ) ; Ascherman v . Superior Court , 254 Cal . App . 2d 506 , 62 Cal . Rptr . 547 , ( 1967 ) ; Costa v . Regents of the University of California ...
Page 70
... privilege regarding the testimony of any doctor who has examined or will examine the plaintiff with respect to plaintiff's conditon . Thus , if plaintiff tries to withhold unfavorable testimony of a medical consultant after obtaining ...
... privilege regarding the testimony of any doctor who has examined or will examine the plaintiff with respect to plaintiff's conditon . Thus , if plaintiff tries to withhold unfavorable testimony of a medical consultant after obtaining ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning