California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 30
Page 31
... presented by the plaintiff . It is therefore essential that any opinion , presented by the defendant - physician which is inconsistent with the plaintiff's theory of the case de- stroyed as unbelievable or impeached , so the defendant's ...
... presented by the plaintiff . It is therefore essential that any opinion , presented by the defendant - physician which is inconsistent with the plaintiff's theory of the case de- stroyed as unbelievable or impeached , so the defendant's ...
Page 37
... presentation of damages of a complex nature , frequently sensory and subjective nature , in a persuasive manner ... presented . D. DAMAGES Medical records sometimes reflect statements made by a patient that are evidence of the pain ...
... presentation of damages of a complex nature , frequently sensory and subjective nature , in a persuasive manner ... presented . D. DAMAGES Medical records sometimes reflect statements made by a patient that are evidence of the pain ...
Page 43
... presentation in the mental injury case which the successful lawyer will need to understand and employ . Normally , in an ... presented merely because they do not understand it as they might do before a modern painting in a museum 133 43.
... presentation in the mental injury case which the successful lawyer will need to understand and employ . Normally , in an ... presented merely because they do not understand it as they might do before a modern painting in a museum 133 43.
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning