California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 29
Page 40
... presents his risk / benefit analysis , it is up to the plaintiff to prove in rebuttal that the total risk of the product is significant and outweighs the benefits even if the one particular risk that caused the plaintiff's injury is ...
... presents his risk / benefit analysis , it is up to the plaintiff to prove in rebuttal that the total risk of the product is significant and outweighs the benefits even if the one particular risk that caused the plaintiff's injury is ...
Page 64
... present medical records , even if they may seem unrelated , as they may contain disclosures of symptoms related to those present in the case in chief . Relevant diagnostic tests or x - rays may have been taken and knowledge of the ...
... present medical records , even if they may seem unrelated , as they may contain disclosures of symptoms related to those present in the case in chief . Relevant diagnostic tests or x - rays may have been taken and knowledge of the ...
Page 34
... present the testimony of the defendant at the outset , he should certainly be put on the stand prior to the ... presents an opportunity for " correc- tion " of the defendant's opinions and fact testimony by all other witnesses ...
... present the testimony of the defendant at the outset , he should certainly be put on the stand prior to the ... presents an opportunity for " correc- tion " of the defendant's opinions and fact testimony by all other witnesses ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning