California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 32
Page 25
... possible the very words used by a particularly important witness . The use of hypothetical questions in trial , providing they are prepared diligently in anticipation of trial , modified in accordance with the evidence as it arises ...
... possible the very words used by a particularly important witness . The use of hypothetical questions in trial , providing they are prepared diligently in anticipation of trial , modified in accordance with the evidence as it arises ...
Page 99
... possible respects in those areas where he may have been negligent or that the accident resulted from some other cause other than the defendant's negligence . Newing v . Cheatham , supra . The appellate courts have been careful to ...
... possible respects in those areas where he may have been negligent or that the accident resulted from some other cause other than the defendant's negligence . Newing v . Cheatham , supra . The appellate courts have been careful to ...
Page 101
... possible , should strenuously argue that the defendant has not produced substantial evidence that the accident resulted from something other than the defendant's negligence or that the defendant exercised due care in all possible ...
... possible , should strenuously argue that the defendant has not produced substantial evidence that the accident resulted from something other than the defendant's negligence or that the defendant exercised due care in all possible ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning