California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 10
Page 67
... notice usually states that the appearance of counsel is unnecessary , it is good practice to carefully review the notice and declaration to determine whether or not an appearance is required , to see if the declaration is sufficient ...
... notice usually states that the appearance of counsel is unnecessary , it is good practice to carefully review the notice and declaration to determine whether or not an appearance is required , to see if the declaration is sufficient ...
Page 71
... notice , the custodians of records or the person designat- ed as the one in charge of the original records , documents or things , designated with specificity , will be required to appear at the proper time and on the proper date of ...
... notice , the custodians of records or the person designat- ed as the one in charge of the original records , documents or things , designated with specificity , will be required to appear at the proper time and on the proper date of ...
Page 73
... notice of that demand , unless a fee for the estimated time required for the deposition is tendered in advance of the date noticed for the deposition , and , unless agreement is reached between counsel , the opposition has no duty to ...
... notice of that demand , unless a fee for the estimated time required for the deposition is tendered in advance of the date noticed for the deposition , and , unless agreement is reached between counsel , the opposition has no duty to ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning