California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 17
Page 103
... motion to suppress at the preliminary hearing but instead to wait until they arrive in Superior Court . It is certainly true that a defendant has the right to bring a de novo motion to suppress in Superior Court whether or not he has ...
... motion to suppress at the preliminary hearing but instead to wait until they arrive in Superior Court . It is certainly true that a defendant has the right to bring a de novo motion to suppress in Superior Court whether or not he has ...
Page 104
... motion . By contrast , if one waits until Superior Court , one usually encounters district attorneys with smaller ... motion to suppress at the examination resulting in the dismissal of one or more charges is most advantageous to the ...
... motion . By contrast , if one waits until Superior Court , one usually encounters district attorneys with smaller ... motion to suppress at the examination resulting in the dismissal of one or more charges is most advantageous to the ...
Page 105
... motion in Superior Court prior to a ruling on his Section 995 motion , he " cures " the magisterial error , and accordingly his 995 motion gets denied . People v . Mardian ( 1975 ) 47 Cal.App . 3d 16 , 121 Cal.Rptr . 269. ) If the ...
... motion in Superior Court prior to a ruling on his Section 995 motion , he " cures " the magisterial error , and accordingly his 995 motion gets denied . People v . Mardian ( 1975 ) 47 Cal.App . 3d 16 , 121 Cal.Rptr . 269. ) If the ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning