California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 24
Page 34
... manufacturer ( manufacturing defect ) , ( 2 ) though " perfectly ” manufactured are unsafe because they produce unacceptable consequences ( design defect ) , and ( 3 ) they are dangerous because they lack adequate warnings and ...
... manufacturer ( manufacturing defect ) , ( 2 ) though " perfectly ” manufactured are unsafe because they produce unacceptable consequences ( design defect ) , and ( 3 ) they are dangerous because they lack adequate warnings and ...
Page 39
... manufacturer " 15 16 Some commentators and courts have said that where design defects are involved , there is no ... manufacturer . If a design defect is found based on the character of the product , the retailer or distributor can be ...
... manufacturer " 15 16 Some commentators and courts have said that where design defects are involved , there is no ... manufacturer . If a design defect is found based on the character of the product , the retailer or distributor can be ...
Page 42
... manufacturer and other consumers . A utility deciding to construct a nuclear power plant near a person's community or his neighbor's decision to install a windmill next door are both risks borne involuntarily . Many risks are not ...
... manufacturer and other consumers . A utility deciding to construct a nuclear power plant near a person's community or his neighbor's decision to install a windmill next door are both risks borne involuntarily . Many risks are not ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning