California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 48
Page 27
... malpractice action against Dr. John Nork ; the defendant who , insofar as is apparent , had no financial motive for doing so - falsely advised plaintiff's counsel that no malpractice had been committed when in fact the plaintiff had ...
... malpractice action against Dr. John Nork ; the defendant who , insofar as is apparent , had no financial motive for doing so - falsely advised plaintiff's counsel that no malpractice had been committed when in fact the plaintiff had ...
Page 28
... malpractice litiga- tion in their practices . See Dietz , Baird and Berul , “ The Medical Malpractice Legal System , " Appendix to Report of the Secretary's Commission on Medical Malpractice , Department of Health , Education , and ...
... malpractice litiga- tion in their practices . See Dietz , Baird and Berul , “ The Medical Malpractice Legal System , " Appendix to Report of the Secretary's Commission on Medical Malpractice , Department of Health , Education , and ...
Page 81
... malpractice is largely dependent upon the proper selection and use of medical experts . Along with the " right " experts , a successful malpractice case also requires what every other case requires : A plaintiff attorney who knows his ...
... malpractice is largely dependent upon the proper selection and use of medical experts . Along with the " right " experts , a successful malpractice case also requires what every other case requires : A plaintiff attorney who knows his ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning