California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 19
Page 28
... limit at that is obviously a further disincentive . But when the prospect under §667.7 of deferral of payment over many years , perhaps several decades , is ― added , the statute postpones beyond commercially tolerable limits the 28.
... limit at that is obviously a further disincentive . But when the prospect under §667.7 of deferral of payment over many years , perhaps several decades , is ― added , the statute postpones beyond commercially tolerable limits the 28.
Page 43
... limits . As the design process evolves the costs of the end product are compared to the cost of producing the product . The design - to - customer requirements approach is the traditional method designers are taught to adopt . The ...
... limits . As the design process evolves the costs of the end product are compared to the cost of producing the product . The design - to - customer requirements approach is the traditional method designers are taught to adopt . The ...
Page 33
... limit the recitation of qualifications by the defendant or his expert unless you are prepared to " change his mind ... limits of the evidence " . Perkins v . Sunset Telephone and Telegraph , ( 1908 ) 155 Cal . 712 , 193 P. 90 . Factual ...
... limit the recitation of qualifications by the defendant or his expert unless you are prepared to " change his mind ... limits of the evidence " . Perkins v . Sunset Telephone and Telegraph , ( 1908 ) 155 Cal . 712 , 193 P. 90 . Factual ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning