California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 14
Page 104
... limitations on an indemnity action does not commence at the same time the statute commences to run in a primary action . B. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS UNDER C.C.P. ยง337.15 : LIPTAK AND HAHN . In Ernest W. Hahn , Inc. v . Superior Court ...
... limitations on an indemnity action does not commence at the same time the statute commences to run in a primary action . B. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS UNDER C.C.P. ยง337.15 : LIPTAK AND HAHN . In Ernest W. Hahn , Inc. v . Superior Court ...
Page 109
... limitation purposes at the same time it accrues in the primary action . The court further held that the fact that the original plaintiff's action against an additional defendant may be barred by the statute of limitations does not bar ...
... limitation purposes at the same time it accrues in the primary action . The court further held that the fact that the original plaintiff's action against an additional defendant may be barred by the statute of limitations does not bar ...
Page 111
... limitations is to protect developers and builders against liability extending indefinitely into the future.18 This policy is not violated in the hypothetical because the hypothetical subcontractor is not potentially liable for an ...
... limitations is to protect developers and builders against liability extending indefinitely into the future.18 This policy is not violated in the hypothetical because the hypothetical subcontractor is not potentially liable for an ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning